東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Research, science and technology par...

Ruiz Villacres, Hugo D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Research, science and technology parks: A global comparison of best practices.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Research, science and technology parks: A global comparison of best practices./
作者:	Ruiz Villacres, Hugo D.
面頁冊數:	124 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-08A(E).
標題:	Philosophy of science. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10076058
ISBN:	9781339584126

Research, science and technology parks: A global comparison of best practices.
Ruiz Villacres, Hugo D.

Research, science and technology parks: A global comparison of best practices. - 124 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2015.

The purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences exist in the evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency between North American, European, and Asian research parks (RPs). Park directors and staff responded to 25 questions from the Survey for Research, Science and Technology Parks. Effectiveness was measured by director's perception of the RP's contribution to economic growth and job creation. Efficiency was evaluated by the interactions between local universities and research parks, assessment of the ecosystem's basic characteristics, and the culture of innovation in the ecosystem. A stratified sampling procedure from a population of 793 parks was used; analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to test for significance. 130 RPs from three continents participated in this study. No significant differences were found in the evaluation of RPs' directors on effectiveness and efficiency of RPs.

ISBN: 9781339584126Subjects--Topical Terms:

2079849
Philosophy of science.

Research, science and technology parks: A global comparison of best practices.
LDR:01879nmm a2200289 4500 001 2071690
005 20160708074641.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339584126
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10076058
035 $a AAI10076058
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ruiz Villacres, Hugo D. $3 3186842
245 1 0 $a Research, science and technology parks: A global comparison of best practices.
300 $a 124 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Nathan W. Hartman; James L. Mohler.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Purdue University, 2015.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to determine if significant differences exist in the evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency between North American, European, and Asian research parks (RPs). Park directors and staff responded to 25 questions from the Survey for Research, Science and Technology Parks. Effectiveness was measured by director's perception of the RP's contribution to economic growth and job creation. Efficiency was evaluated by the interactions between local universities and research parks, assessment of the ecosystem's basic characteristics, and the culture of innovation in the ecosystem. A stratified sampling procedure from a population of 793 parks was used; analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to test for significance. 130 RPs from three continents participated in this study. No significant differences were found in the evaluation of RPs' directors on effectiveness and efficiency of RPs.
590 $a School code: 0183.
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a Purdue University. $b Technology. $3 1022269
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-08A(E).
790 $a 0183
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10076058