東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Differences in Remedial Pedagogy App...

Accurso-Salguero, Jessica.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Differences in Remedial Pedagogy Approaches between Teachers and Students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Differences in Remedial Pedagogy Approaches between Teachers and Students./
作者:	Accurso-Salguero, Jessica.
面頁冊數:	146 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-09A(E).
標題:	Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10100996
ISBN:	9781339648484

Differences in Remedial Pedagogy Approaches between Teachers and Students.
Accurso-Salguero, Jessica.

Differences in Remedial Pedagogy Approaches between Teachers and Students. - 146 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2016.

This study determined and assessed the perceptions of both students and teachers on the best approaches to remedial education. Although much of the research in the remedial education field has used quantitative approaches to determine the impact of taking remedial classes on academic outcomes, qualitative research has been less extensively used but offers a better understanding of why students do not remediate successfully. While remedial programs work well when students successfully complete remedial courses, students often fail to complete them. Therefore, it is important to understand why remedial programs sometimes succeed but so often fail. Based on the Grubb and Gabriner (2013) triangle of instruction and modifying this triangle in the context of research by Cox (2009) and Jenkins (2011), this qualitative study sought to develop an understanding of students' taking remedial courses and teachers' perspectives on teaching remedial courses by taking a multipronged data collection approach. The research questions in this study were used to determine how faculty and students describe the effective teaching methods conducive to successful student learning. This case-study approach included classroom-based observations of teaching methods, student attitudes, and interviews of both teachers and students. The interview topics included how students learn best from the perspective of both teachers and students. More specifically, the sample for individual interviews consisted of 12 students and two teachers participating in remedial courses at one urban East Coast community college.

ISBN: 9781339648484Subjects--Topical Terms:

526425
Educational evaluation.

Differences in Remedial Pedagogy Approaches between Teachers and Students.
LDR:02494nmm a2200289 4500 001 2071487
005 20160707145637.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339648484
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10100996
035 $a AAI10100996
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Accurso-Salguero, Jessica. $3 3186628
245 1 0 $a Differences in Remedial Pedagogy Approaches between Teachers and Students.
300 $a 146 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Eunyoung Kim.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2016.
520 $a This study determined and assessed the perceptions of both students and teachers on the best approaches to remedial education. Although much of the research in the remedial education field has used quantitative approaches to determine the impact of taking remedial classes on academic outcomes, qualitative research has been less extensively used but offers a better understanding of why students do not remediate successfully. While remedial programs work well when students successfully complete remedial courses, students often fail to complete them. Therefore, it is important to understand why remedial programs sometimes succeed but so often fail. Based on the Grubb and Gabriner (2013) triangle of instruction and modifying this triangle in the context of research by Cox (2009) and Jenkins (2011), this qualitative study sought to develop an understanding of students' taking remedial courses and teachers' perspectives on teaching remedial courses by taking a multipronged data collection approach. The research questions in this study were used to determine how faculty and students describe the effective teaching methods conducive to successful student learning. This case-study approach included classroom-based observations of teaching methods, student attitudes, and interviews of both teachers and students. The interview topics included how students learn best from the perspective of both teachers and students. More specifically, the sample for individual interviews consisted of 12 students and two teachers participating in remedial courses at one urban East Coast community college.
590 $a School code: 0199.
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Seton Hall University. $b Education Leadership, Management and Policy. $3 3169874
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-09A(E).
790 $a 0199
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10100996