東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Vers...

Shimizu, Dominique.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Versus Text-based Instructor Communication in a Blended Online Learning Environment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Versus Text-based Instructor Communication in a Blended Online Learning Environment./
作者:	Shimizu, Dominique.
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-06A(E).
標題:	Educational technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10003795
ISBN:	9781339429038

Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Versus Text-based Instructor Communication in a Blended Online Learning Environment.
Shimizu, Dominique.

Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Versus Text-based Instructor Communication in a Blended Online Learning Environment. - 117 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northcentral University, 2016.

Though blended course audio feedback has been associated with several measures of course satisfaction at the postsecondary and graduate levels compared to text feedback, it may take longer to prepare and positive results are largely unverified in K-12 literature. The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate the time investment and learning impact of audio communications with 228 secondary students in a blended online learning biology unit at a central Florida public high school. A short, individualized audio message regarding the student's progress was given to each student in the audio group; similar text-based messages were given to each student in the text-based group on the same schedule; a control got no feedback. A pretest and posttest were employed to measure learning gains in the three groups. To compare the learning gains in two types of feedback with each other and to no feedback, a controlled, randomized, experimental design was implemented. In addition, the creation and posting of audio and text feedback communications were timed in order to assess whether audio feedback took longer to produce than text only feedback. While audio feedback communications did take longer to create and post, there was no difference between learning gains as measured by posttest scores when student received audio, text-based, or no feedback. Future studies using a similar randomized, controlled experimental design are recommended to verify these results and test whether the trend holds in a broader range of subjects, over different time frames, and using a variety of assessment types to measure student learning.

ISBN: 9781339429038Subjects--Topical Terms:

517670
Educational technology.

Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Versus Text-based Instructor Communication in a Blended Online Learning Environment.
LDR:02585nmm a2200289 4500 001 2071447
005 20160707145626.5
008 170521s2016 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339429038
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10003795
035 $a AAI10003795
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shimizu, Dominique. $3 3186588
245 1 0 $a Comparing Learning Gains: Audio Versus Text-based Instructor Communication in a Blended Online Learning Environment.
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Thomas C. McLaughlin.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Northcentral University, 2016.
520 $a Though blended course audio feedback has been associated with several measures of course satisfaction at the postsecondary and graduate levels compared to text feedback, it may take longer to prepare and positive results are largely unverified in K-12 literature. The purpose of this quantitative study was to investigate the time investment and learning impact of audio communications with 228 secondary students in a blended online learning biology unit at a central Florida public high school. A short, individualized audio message regarding the student's progress was given to each student in the audio group; similar text-based messages were given to each student in the text-based group on the same schedule; a control got no feedback. A pretest and posttest were employed to measure learning gains in the three groups. To compare the learning gains in two types of feedback with each other and to no feedback, a controlled, randomized, experimental design was implemented. In addition, the creation and posting of audio and text feedback communications were timed in order to assess whether audio feedback took longer to produce than text only feedback. While audio feedback communications did take longer to create and post, there was no difference between learning gains as measured by posttest scores when student received audio, text-based, or no feedback. Future studies using a similar randomized, controlled experimental design are recommended to verify these results and test whether the trend holds in a broader range of subjects, over different time frames, and using a variety of assessment types to measure student learning.
590 $a School code: 1443.
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b Education. $3 2049771
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-06A(E).
790 $a 1443
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2016
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10003795