東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT M...

Reckley, Monica B.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT Mathematics Program.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT Mathematics Program./
作者:	Reckley, Monica B.
面頁冊數:	199 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-10A(E).
標題:	Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3625964
ISBN:	9781321004533

Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT Mathematics Program.
Reckley, Monica B.

Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT Mathematics Program. - 199 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Walden University, 2014.

A mathematics Saturday boot camp was created at a Title I middle school to address high stakes testing pressures, performance struggles surrounding the Georgia math curriculum, and accountability requirements. The leadership body at the school sought to evaluate the program's effectiveness. This study served as the program evaluation, and the results were revealed on a summative basis to the administration and other stakeholders. The social justice conceptual framework was the foundation upon which the study was based because assisting at-risk students was a focal point of both the framework and the boot camp program. The evaluation focused on gathering stakeholder perceptions through 6 interviews and 52 satisfaction surveys as well as comparison of pre and post scores in the mathematics testing outcomes of program participants. Interview transcripts were analyzed, and the interview data were sorted based on emergent themes. In addition, a summary and analysis of the program satisfaction surveys from students, parents, and teachers revealed pros and cons of the program. Student scores from the program assessments were examined through a paired samples t test and comparisons of central tendencies. The change in math performance was deemed insignificant. Separate analysis of the scores from the state's standardized math test showed that only 6% of participants exceeded the standards. The quantitative data coupled with stakeholders' opinions were used to inform local decision making by school officials who opted to transform the Saturday boot camp into a 5-month extended weekday program. Social change was facilitated by encouraging social justice for students in the middle school through the evaluation of and amendments to the supplemental mathematics program that promote increased test performance for disadvantaged student participants.

ISBN: 9781321004533Subjects--Topical Terms:

526425
Educational evaluation.

Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT Mathematics Program.
LDR:02738nmm a2200289 4500 001 2070969
005 20160628072941.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321004533
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3625964
035 $a AAI3625964
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reckley, Monica B. $3 3186062
245 1 0 $a Evaluation of a Supplemental GCRCT Mathematics Program.
300 $a 199 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mario Castro.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Walden University, 2014.
520 $a A mathematics Saturday boot camp was created at a Title I middle school to address high stakes testing pressures, performance struggles surrounding the Georgia math curriculum, and accountability requirements. The leadership body at the school sought to evaluate the program's effectiveness. This study served as the program evaluation, and the results were revealed on a summative basis to the administration and other stakeholders. The social justice conceptual framework was the foundation upon which the study was based because assisting at-risk students was a focal point of both the framework and the boot camp program. The evaluation focused on gathering stakeholder perceptions through 6 interviews and 52 satisfaction surveys as well as comparison of pre and post scores in the mathematics testing outcomes of program participants. Interview transcripts were analyzed, and the interview data were sorted based on emergent themes. In addition, a summary and analysis of the program satisfaction surveys from students, parents, and teachers revealed pros and cons of the program. Student scores from the program assessments were examined through a paired samples t test and comparisons of central tendencies. The change in math performance was deemed insignificant. Separate analysis of the scores from the state's standardized math test showed that only 6% of participants exceeded the standards. The quantitative data coupled with stakeholders' opinions were used to inform local decision making by school officials who opted to transform the Saturday boot camp into a 5-month extended weekday program. Social change was facilitated by encouraging social justice for students in the middle school through the evaluation of and amendments to the supplemental mathematics program that promote increased test performance for disadvantaged student participants.
590 $a School code: 0543.
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Middle school education. $3 969762
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0450
710 2 $a Walden University. $b Education. $3 1022723
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-10A(E).
790 $a 0543
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3625964