東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Does content knowledge matter for ne...

Reeves, Todd D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Does content knowledge matter for new teachers?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Does content knowledge matter for new teachers?/
作者:	Reeves, Todd D.
面頁冊數:	303 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-04A(E).
標題:	Teacher education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3604992
ISBN:	9781303610165

Does content knowledge matter for new teachers?
Reeves, Todd D.

Does content knowledge matter for new teachers? - 303 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2013.

There is considerable evidence that new teachers are ill prepared for classroom practice, including self-reported evidence collected from teachers (e.g., Levine, 2006), and statistical evidence for differences in the achievement of students with new versus more experienced teachers (Rivkin, Hanushek, & Kain, 2005). In light of the challenges encountered by new teachers (e.g., Levine, 2006), this study examined the value of different forms of teacher knowledge for teachers with different levels of experience. In particular, this study investigated the interactive relationship between teaching experience and teacher content knowledge, and student achievement in mathematics and science. In New York City, Boyd et al. (2009) linked practice-focused teacher preparation to student mathematics achievement in the first year of teaching and teacher content preparation to achievement in the second. However, other studies demonstrated interactions between teaching experience and content knowledge with different interpretations (e.g., Kukla-Acevedo, 2009; Monk, 1994). At the same time, this study examined the interactive relationship between teaching experience and teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, and student achievement.

ISBN: 9781303610165Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172312
Teacher education.

Does content knowledge matter for new teachers?
LDR:03446nmm a2200313 4500 001 2070962
005 20160628072938.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303610165
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3604992
035 $a AAI3604992
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reeves, Todd D. $3 3186053
245 1 0 $a Does content knowledge matter for new teachers?
300 $a 303 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Joseph J. Pedulla.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston College, 2013.
520 $a There is considerable evidence that new teachers are ill prepared for classroom practice, including self-reported evidence collected from teachers (e.g., Levine, 2006), and statistical evidence for differences in the achievement of students with new versus more experienced teachers (Rivkin, Hanushek, & Kain, 2005). In light of the challenges encountered by new teachers (e.g., Levine, 2006), this study examined the value of different forms of teacher knowledge for teachers with different levels of experience. In particular, this study investigated the interactive relationship between teaching experience and teacher content knowledge, and student achievement in mathematics and science. In New York City, Boyd et al. (2009) linked practice-focused teacher preparation to student mathematics achievement in the first year of teaching and teacher content preparation to achievement in the second. However, other studies demonstrated interactions between teaching experience and content knowledge with different interpretations (e.g., Kukla-Acevedo, 2009; Monk, 1994). At the same time, this study examined the interactive relationship between teaching experience and teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, and student achievement.
520 $a Extant models of teacher career development (Huberman, 1989; National Research Council, 2010) and how teacher education affects student achievement (e.g., Desimone, 2009) offered theoretical grounding for the study. With nationally representative samples of fourth and eighth grade U.S. students--participants in the 2011 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study--this study employed hierarchical linear modeling to address its research questions among an array of student achievement outcomes in the domains of mathematics and science. This study attempted to account for salient student, teacher, and contextual factors, and the probabilities of teachers' receipt of various teacher education "treatments" (i.e., propensity score analysis) to reduce the plausibility of selection threats to internal validity.
520 $a The study found no evidence for relationships between teacher content knowledge or pedagogical content knowledge and student mathematics and science achievement in fourth and eighth grade. Furthermore, the results indicated no interactive relationships between forms of teacher knowledge and teaching experience, and student achievement in these grades/subjects. The limitations of cross-sectional, observational studies using large-scale data and directions for further research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0016.
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 641129
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0714
710 2 $a Boston College. $b LSOE - Educational Research, Measurement and Evaluation. $3 3171811
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-04A(E).
790 $a 0016
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3604992