東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Implicit measurement of extraversion...

Rasmussen, Jennifer Lynn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Implicit measurement of extraversion and agreeableness using conditional reasoning tests: The impact of faking.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Implicit measurement of extraversion and agreeableness using conditional reasoning tests: The impact of faking./
作者:	Rasmussen, Jennifer Lynn.
面頁冊數:	163 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-04B(E).
標題:	Occupational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3738252
ISBN:	9781339284750

Implicit measurement of extraversion and agreeableness using conditional reasoning tests: The impact of faking.
Rasmussen, Jennifer Lynn.

Implicit measurement of extraversion and agreeableness using conditional reasoning tests: The impact of faking. - 163 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2015.

Faking on personality tests in selection contexts remains a concern for organizations and researchers. Conditional reasoning tests (CRTs) are purported to predict construct-related outcomes and circumvent the faking issue by tapping into subconscious aspects of personality. However, because CRTs are designed to look like inductive reasoning tests, the true purpose of the test may remain hidden from test takers resulting in this reduction in fakeability. In order to investigate these claims, conditional reasoning tests for Extraversion and Agreeableness were developed and the validity and fakeability of these CRTs to traditional, self-report personality tests was compared. Additionally, the current study examines whether any reduction in the ability of test takers to fake the CRTs is due to the implicit nature of the test or the superficial appearance of conditional reasoning items as inductive reasoning items. The results of this study show that participants were not able to fake the CRT if the purpose of the test at a personality measure remains hidden. This finding persists when analyzing the effects on Extraversion and Agreeableness separately or when the true purpose of the test as a personality measure is revealed. This is a positive outcome for proponents of conditional reasoning tests. The results of this study indicate that it is the endorsement of justification mechanisms that prevent test takers from faking, supporting the social cognitive theory on which CRTs are based. However, the CRTs do not predict relevant outcomes as well as traditional personality tests for Agreeableness and Extraversion. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781339284750Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122852
Occupational psychology.

Implicit measurement of extraversion and agreeableness using conditional reasoning tests: The impact of faking.
LDR:02625nmm a2200277 4500 001 2070724
005 20160617121853.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339284750
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3738252
035 $a AAI3738252
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rasmussen, Jennifer Lynn. $3 3185790
245 1 0 $a Implicit measurement of extraversion and agreeableness using conditional reasoning tests: The impact of faking.
300 $a 163 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-04(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Mindy E. Bergman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University, 2015.
520 $a Faking on personality tests in selection contexts remains a concern for organizations and researchers. Conditional reasoning tests (CRTs) are purported to predict construct-related outcomes and circumvent the faking issue by tapping into subconscious aspects of personality. However, because CRTs are designed to look like inductive reasoning tests, the true purpose of the test may remain hidden from test takers resulting in this reduction in fakeability. In order to investigate these claims, conditional reasoning tests for Extraversion and Agreeableness were developed and the validity and fakeability of these CRTs to traditional, self-report personality tests was compared. Additionally, the current study examines whether any reduction in the ability of test takers to fake the CRTs is due to the implicit nature of the test or the superficial appearance of conditional reasoning items as inductive reasoning items. The results of this study show that participants were not able to fake the CRT if the purpose of the test at a personality measure remains hidden. This finding persists when analyzing the effects on Extraversion and Agreeableness separately or when the true purpose of the test as a personality measure is revealed. This is a positive outcome for proponents of conditional reasoning tests. The results of this study indicate that it is the endorsement of justification mechanisms that prevent test takers from faking, supporting the social cognitive theory on which CRTs are based. However, the CRTs do not predict relevant outcomes as well as traditional personality tests for Agreeableness and Extraversion. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0803.
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a Texas A&M University. $b Psychology. $3 3185791
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-04B(E).
790 $a 0803
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3738252