東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Construct validity of assessment cen...

Hardison, Chaitra Monet.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Construct validity of assessment center overall ratings: An investigation of relationships with and incremental criterion related validity over Big 5 personality traits and cognitive ability.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Construct validity of assessment center overall ratings: An investigation of relationships with and incremental criterion related validity over Big 5 personality traits and cognitive ability./
作者:	Hardison, Chaitra Monet.
面頁冊數:	124 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: B, page: 6959.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International66-12B.
標題:	Occupational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3198095
ISBN:	9780542438233

Construct validity of assessment center overall ratings: An investigation of relationships with and incremental criterion related validity over Big 5 personality traits and cognitive ability.
Hardison, Chaitra Monet.

Construct validity of assessment center overall ratings: An investigation of relationships with and incremental criterion related validity over Big 5 personality traits and cognitive ability. - 124 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: B, page: 6959.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2005.

Ample evidence exists showing the assessment center (AC) overall assessment rating (OAR) is predictive of job relevant criteria, however the reasons why are still not clearly established. This paper presents a Job Sampling theory of OAR construct validity suggesting that AC's are maximal performance measures that capture two of the three direct determinants of job performance (declarative knowledge, and procedural knowledge and skills). This theory is used to explain which constructs may underlie the criterion related validity of AC's. A meta-analytic test of that theory using 11 different AC's is presented. It was hypothesized that part of the AC OAR can be explained by cognitive ability and the Big 5 personality traits, however it was also hypothesized that the OAR would still show incremental validity over cognitive ability and the Big 5 for predicting later performance. The hypotheses were supported. The AC OAR still showed criterion related validity even after controlling for cognitive ability and personality of the participants indicating the OAR measures something not captured by those traits. These findings support the theory that the AC OAR may represent a maximal performance measure. Implications of the Job Sampling theory and suggestions for future construct validity research are discussed.

ISBN: 9780542438233Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122852
Occupational psychology.

Construct validity of assessment center overall ratings: An investigation of relationships with and incremental criterion related validity over Big 5 personality traits and cognitive ability.
LDR:02313nmm a2200277 4500 001 2070620
005 20160617121829.5
008 170521s2005 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780542438233
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3198095
035 $a AAI3198095
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hardison, Chaitra Monet. $3 3185685
245 1 0 $a Construct validity of assessment center overall ratings: An investigation of relationships with and incremental criterion related validity over Big 5 personality traits and cognitive ability.
300 $a 124 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-12, Section: B, page: 6959.
500 $a Adviser: Paul Sackett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2005.
520 $a Ample evidence exists showing the assessment center (AC) overall assessment rating (OAR) is predictive of job relevant criteria, however the reasons why are still not clearly established. This paper presents a Job Sampling theory of OAR construct validity suggesting that AC's are maximal performance measures that capture two of the three direct determinants of job performance (declarative knowledge, and procedural knowledge and skills). This theory is used to explain which constructs may underlie the criterion related validity of AC's. A meta-analytic test of that theory using 11 different AC's is presented. It was hypothesized that part of the AC OAR can be explained by cognitive ability and the Big 5 personality traits, however it was also hypothesized that the OAR would still show incremental validity over cognitive ability and the Big 5 for predicting later performance. The hypotheses were supported. The AC OAR still showed criterion related validity even after controlling for cognitive ability and personality of the participants indicating the OAR measures something not captured by those traits. These findings support the theory that the AC OAR may represent a maximal performance measure. Implications of the Job Sampling theory and suggestions for future construct validity research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0130.
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $3 676231
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 66-12B.
790 $a 0130
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2005
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3198095