東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Take five? Examining the impact of m...

Bennett, Andrew A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Take five? Examining the impact of microbreak duration, activities, and appraisals on human energy and performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Take five? Examining the impact of microbreak duration, activities, and appraisals on human energy and performance./
作者:	Bennett, Andrew A.
面頁冊數:	140 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International77-03A(E).
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3727013
ISBN:	9781339119168

Take five? Examining the impact of microbreak duration, activities, and appraisals on human energy and performance.
Bennett, Andrew A.

Take five? Examining the impact of microbreak duration, activities, and appraisals on human energy and performance. - 140 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Virginia Commonwealth University, 2015.

Employees in many occupations deplete cognitive resources of attention and energy (Dodge, 1913; Kahneman, 1973), impacting performance on subsequent work tasks (Dalal, Bhave, & Fiset, 2014). Individuals spend upwards of 10% of formal work time taking a break completing non-work tasks (Esteves, 2013; McGehee & Owen, 1940) in an effort to replenish these resources (Fritz, Lam, & Spritzer, 2011; Kim et al., 2014). This study used a randomized controlled experiment to answer three questions that are new contributions to the literature. First, I explored if engaging in a specific activity (watching a funny video, meditating, or completing a different work task) during the microbreak helped induce recovery processes. Second, I questioned if an individual's appraisal (psychological detachment, relaxation, and enjoyment) of the break impacted outcomes in addition to, or potentially more than, engaging in a break activity. Third, I investigated if the time duration (1-minute, 5-minute, or 9-minute) of the microbreak impacted outcomes. Results show that taking any break between work tasks allowed individuals to feel less fatigued, more energized, and more attentive. Surprisingly, in many instances a 1-minute break was just as effective as taking a longer break of 5 or 9 minutes, and for these shorter break periods, engaging in a different work task for a short period rather than disengaging from work was the best at improving attention. In addition, to increase feeling energized at work, appraising the break as being enjoyable was more important than the actual break activity. Combined, this study has both an academic and practical impact, finding that just like with work that depletes physical resources, short breaks also benefit employees engaging in work that depleted cognitive resources.

ISBN: 9781339119168Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Take five? Examining the impact of microbreak duration, activities, and appraisals on human energy and performance.
LDR:02758nmm a2200277 4500 001 2070465
005 20160606115821.5
008 170521s2015 eng d
020 $a 9781339119168
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3727013
035 $a AAI3727013
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bennett, Andrew A. $3 3185517
245 1 0 $a Take five? Examining the impact of microbreak duration, activities, and appraisals on human energy and performance.
300 $a 140 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Steven Douglas Pugh; Allison S. Gabriel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Virginia Commonwealth University, 2015.
520 $a Employees in many occupations deplete cognitive resources of attention and energy (Dodge, 1913; Kahneman, 1973), impacting performance on subsequent work tasks (Dalal, Bhave, & Fiset, 2014). Individuals spend upwards of 10% of formal work time taking a break completing non-work tasks (Esteves, 2013; McGehee & Owen, 1940) in an effort to replenish these resources (Fritz, Lam, & Spritzer, 2011; Kim et al., 2014). This study used a randomized controlled experiment to answer three questions that are new contributions to the literature. First, I explored if engaging in a specific activity (watching a funny video, meditating, or completing a different work task) during the microbreak helped induce recovery processes. Second, I questioned if an individual's appraisal (psychological detachment, relaxation, and enjoyment) of the break impacted outcomes in addition to, or potentially more than, engaging in a break activity. Third, I investigated if the time duration (1-minute, 5-minute, or 9-minute) of the microbreak impacted outcomes. Results show that taking any break between work tasks allowed individuals to feel less fatigued, more energized, and more attentive. Surprisingly, in many instances a 1-minute break was just as effective as taking a longer break of 5 or 9 minutes, and for these shorter break periods, engaging in a different work task for a short period rather than disengaging from work was the best at improving attention. In addition, to increase feeling energized at work, appraising the break as being enjoyable was more important than the actual break activity. Combined, this study has both an academic and practical impact, finding that just like with work that depletes physical resources, short breaks also benefit employees engaging in work that depleted cognitive resources.
590 $a School code: 2383.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0624
710 2 0 $a Virginia Commonwealth University. $b Business. $3 3170060
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 77-03A(E).
790 $a 2383
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3727013