東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Measuring Individual Capacity to Lea...

Daniels, Michael J.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Measuring Individual Capacity to Lead: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Measuring Individual Capacity to Lead: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument./
Author:	Daniels, Michael J.
Description:	156 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
Subject:	Management. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3700819
ISBN:	9781321709544

Measuring Individual Capacity to Lead: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.
Daniels, Michael J.

Measuring Individual Capacity to Lead: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument. - 156 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2015.

Few studies have presented a conceptually complete model describing capacity to be a leader. This study developed and tested a measure that operationalizes individual capacity to lead. The measure is based on integrating the conceptual models of Popper and Mayseless (2007), Dries and Pepermans (2012), and Chan and Drasgow (2001). The resulting measure may significantly improve an organization's ability to select individuals for training and development who have the highest capacity to succeed as leaders. Ultimately, this may prove useful for human resources selection, development initiatives, succession planning, and recruiting. This measurement tool was developed using a four-step process: (a) item development, (b) scale identification and validation through use of a Delphi panel, (c) item reduction and identification of underlying dimensions through use of a large sample (N = 467) of working adults, and (d) assessment of construct validity of the capacity-to-lead instrument. The measure has three components: follower-focused ( = .961), focused on leading and influencing others; learning agility (alpha = .925), focused on the idea of a leader being adaptable to changing environments, situations, and stimuli; and intellectual curiosity (alpha = .891), focused on a leader having a curiosity that stems from an intellectual framework and pursuit. Future research ideas, limitations of the study, and practical applications for this instrument are provided.

ISBN: 9781321709544Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

Measuring Individual Capacity to Lead: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.
LDR:02357nmm a2200277 4500 001 2070363
005 20160606115805.5
008 170521s2015 eng d
020 $a 9781321709544
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3700819
035 $a AAI3700819
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Daniels, Michael J. $3 3185414
245 1 0 $a Measuring Individual Capacity to Lead: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.
300 $a 156 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Dail Fields.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2015.
520 $a Few studies have presented a conceptually complete model describing capacity to be a leader. This study developed and tested a measure that operationalizes individual capacity to lead. The measure is based on integrating the conceptual models of Popper and Mayseless (2007), Dries and Pepermans (2012), and Chan and Drasgow (2001). The resulting measure may significantly improve an organization's ability to select individuals for training and development who have the highest capacity to succeed as leaders. Ultimately, this may prove useful for human resources selection, development initiatives, succession planning, and recruiting. This measurement tool was developed using a four-step process: (a) item development, (b) scale identification and validation through use of a Delphi panel, (c) item reduction and identification of underlying dimensions through use of a large sample (N = 467) of working adults, and (d) assessment of construct validity of the capacity-to-lead instrument. The measure has three components: follower-focused ( = .961), focused on leading and influencing others; learning agility (alpha = .925), focused on the idea of a leader being adaptable to changing environments, situations, and stimuli; and intellectual curiosity (alpha = .891), focused on a leader having a curiosity that stems from an intellectual framework and pursuit. Future research ideas, limitations of the study, and practical applications for this instrument are provided.
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0624
710 2 0 $a Regent University. $b School of Business and Leadership. $3 3172706
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 1058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3700819