東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The scientific and the aesthetic in ...

Cudnik, David Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The scientific and the aesthetic in the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The scientific and the aesthetic in the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel./
作者:	Cudnik, David Michael.
面頁冊數:	432 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-07A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582363
ISBN:	9781321614817

The scientific and the aesthetic in the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel.
Cudnik, David Michael.

The scientific and the aesthetic in the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel. - 432 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Dallas, 2015.

Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel both exalt aesthetic experience as fertile ground for philosophizing but hold opposing views with regard to the state of the subject within that experience. For Schopenhauer, the subject is absolved of individuality within aesthetic experience. For Marcel, on the other hand, the individuality of the subject is affirmed and fulfilled. The focus of this dissertation is to identify the sources of this disagreement and to argue for the superiority of Marcel's position to Schopenhauer's.

ISBN: 9781321614817Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

The scientific and the aesthetic in the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel.
LDR:04530nmm a2200337 4500 001 2068376
005 20160422121541.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321614817
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3582363
035 $a AAI3582363
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cudnik, David Michael. $3 3183310
245 1 4 $a The scientific and the aesthetic in the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel.
300 $a 432 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Robert E. Wood.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Dallas, 2015.
520 $a Arthur Schopenhauer and Gabriel Marcel both exalt aesthetic experience as fertile ground for philosophizing but hold opposing views with regard to the state of the subject within that experience. For Schopenhauer, the subject is absolved of individuality within aesthetic experience. For Marcel, on the other hand, the individuality of the subject is affirmed and fulfilled. The focus of this dissertation is to identify the sources of this disagreement and to argue for the superiority of Marcel's position to Schopenhauer's.
520 $a I begin by developing a distinction between two ways in which time and space intersect in the present moment in experience. I use this distinction as a structure through which I can draw out the similarities and the differences between Schopenhauer and Marcel with regard to experience and the crystallization of experience through the contents of sensation into either scientific knowledge or aesthetic contemplation. The basis of scientific knowledge is temporalized space, which denotes the type of experience in which the succession of time is prominent and reduces the significance of the present moment to punctual simplicity. Aesthetic contemplation occurs within spatialized time, in which the attention of the individual is firmly fixed on the object of his consideration in the present moment.
520 $a The basic claim which guides the distinction between temporalized space and spatialized time is that all conscious experience must include both time and space. The experience of time grounds the awareness of self, while the experience of space founds the awareness of that which is other than the self. Schopenhauer denies the awareness of individuality through time in aesthetic contemplation. On the contrary, he states that contemplation is a will-less and timeless experience. Although he agrees that music is experienced in time, Schopenhauer holds its hearing brings about a direct encounter with the metaphysical principle of the will unclouded by the awareness of individuality. Marcel, on the other hand, affirms the positive role of time in aesthetic experience. This also allows Marcel to affirm that the contents of all five senses can be objects of aesthetic appreciation. He does this effectively through the example of the connoisseur. Schopenhauer, by contrast, limits the aesthetic to the contents of sight and hearing.
520 $a Although Schopenhauer denies a positive role for the individual within contemplation, he describes the Platonic Idea, i.e., the object of contemplation, as an inexhaustible depth. Consequently, it is an object that can fulfill the inexhaustible longing which is the essential feature of the individual will. For Marcel, the communion formed between the subject and contemplated object is the reality of intersubjectivity and brings about the positive fulfillment of the subject rather than the abandonment of individuality as Schopenhauer proposes.
520 $a With regard to the unique case of music, Schopenhauer claims that it transcends the Platonic Ideas and gives expression to the underlying cosmic Will. The temporal nature of music achieves this effect by arousing emotion within the listener. Consequently, although Schopenhauer's reflections on the universality of music are apt, he is hard pressed to deny the involvement of the individual in the experience. Indeed, how can one recognize the emotion unless it resonates with one's heart, that is, with the seat of one's individuality? On the contrary, music is both deeply personal and opens one up to the metaphysical as Marcel proposes.
590 $a School code: 0150.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Aesthetics. $3 523036
650 4 $a Philosophy of science. $2 bicssc $3 2079849
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0650
690 $a 0402
710 2 $a University of Dallas. $3 1295614
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-07A(E).
790 $a 0150
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3582363