東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Digital and multimedia forensics jus...

Popejoy, Amy Lynnette.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Digital and multimedia forensics justified: An appraisal on professional policy and legislation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Digital and multimedia forensics justified: An appraisal on professional policy and legislation./
作者:	Popejoy, Amy Lynnette.
面頁冊數:	56 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International55-01(E).
標題:	Science education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1598313
ISBN:	9781339027753

Digital and multimedia forensics justified: An appraisal on professional policy and legislation.
Popejoy, Amy Lynnette.

Digital and multimedia forensics justified: An appraisal on professional policy and legislation. - 56 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2015.

Recent progress in professional policy and legislation at the federal level in the field of forensic science constructs a transformation of new outcomes for future experts. An exploratory and descriptive qualitative methodology was used to critique and examine Digital and Multimedia Science (DMS) as a justified forensic discipline. Chapter I summarizes Recommendations 1, 2, and 10 of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Report 2009 regarding disparities and challenges facing the forensic science community. Chapter I also delivers the overall foundation and framework of this thesis, specifically how it relates to DMS. Chapter II expands on Recommendation 1: "The Promotion and Development of Forensic Science," and focuses chronologically on professional policy and legislative advances through 2014. Chapter III addresses Recommendation 2: "The Standardization of Terminology in Reporting and Testimony," and the issues of legal language and terminology, model laboratory reports, and expert testimony concerning DMS case law. Chapter IV analyzes Recommendation 10: "Insufficient Education and Training," identifying legal awareness for the digital and multimedia examiner to understand the role of the expert witness, the attorney, the judge and the admission of forensic science evidence in litigation in our criminal justice system. Finally, Chapter V studies three DME specific laboratories at the Texas state, county, and city level, concentrating on current practice and procedure.

ISBN: 9781339027753Subjects--Topical Terms:

521340
Science education.

Digital and multimedia forensics justified: An appraisal on professional policy and legislation.
LDR:02392nmm a2200289 4500 001 2067643
005 20160418090141.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781339027753
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1598313
035 $a AAI1598313
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Popejoy, Amy Lynnette. $3 3182503
245 1 0 $a Digital and multimedia forensics justified: An appraisal on professional policy and legislation.
300 $a 56 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-01.
500 $a Adviser: Catalin Grigoras.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Colorado at Denver, 2015.
520 $a Recent progress in professional policy and legislation at the federal level in the field of forensic science constructs a transformation of new outcomes for future experts. An exploratory and descriptive qualitative methodology was used to critique and examine Digital and Multimedia Science (DMS) as a justified forensic discipline. Chapter I summarizes Recommendations 1, 2, and 10 of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Report 2009 regarding disparities and challenges facing the forensic science community. Chapter I also delivers the overall foundation and framework of this thesis, specifically how it relates to DMS. Chapter II expands on Recommendation 1: "The Promotion and Development of Forensic Science," and focuses chronologically on professional policy and legislative advances through 2014. Chapter III addresses Recommendation 2: "The Standardization of Terminology in Reporting and Testimony," and the issues of legal language and terminology, model laboratory reports, and expert testimony concerning DMS case law. Chapter IV analyzes Recommendation 10: "Insufficient Education and Training," identifying legal awareness for the digital and multimedia examiner to understand the role of the expert witness, the attorney, the judge and the admission of forensic science evidence in litigation in our criminal justice system. Finally, Chapter V studies three DME specific laboratories at the Texas state, county, and city level, concentrating on current practice and procedure.
590 $a School code: 0765.
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Technical communication. $3 3172863
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0643
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Colorado at Denver. $b Recording Arts. $3 2102297
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 55-01(E).
790 $a 0765
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1598313