東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The language of leadership a feminis...

Khwaja, Tehmina.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The language of leadership a feminist poststructural discourse analysis of inaugural addresses by presidents of high profile research universities.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The language of leadership a feminist poststructural discourse analysis of inaugural addresses by presidents of high profile research universities./
作者:	Khwaja, Tehmina.
面頁冊數:	321 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-10A(E).
標題:	Educational leadership. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3662991
ISBN:	9781321797190

The language of leadership a feminist poststructural discourse analysis of inaugural addresses by presidents of high profile research universities.
Khwaja, Tehmina.

The language of leadership a feminist poststructural discourse analysis of inaugural addresses by presidents of high profile research universities. - 321 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The College of William and Mary, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The leadership landscape of high profile research universities has changed over the last 20 years with increasing participation of women in senior positions of leadership, including presidencies, providing the opportunity to study their rhetoric alongside their male counterparts. Using the discourse analysis approaches of Gee (2014) and Allan (2003, 2008, 2010), and Bitzer's (1992) theory of rhetorical situation, this study explored how female and male presidents of high profile research universities use rhetoric in their inaugural addresses, and to what extent, and in what ways, their rhetoric is gendered.

ISBN: 9781321797190Subjects--Topical Terms:

529436
Educational leadership.

The language of leadership a feminist poststructural discourse analysis of inaugural addresses by presidents of high profile research universities.
LDR:02870nmm a2200325 4500 001 2066463
005 20151106144902.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321797190
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3662991
035 $a AAI3662991
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Khwaja, Tehmina. $3 3181261
245 1 4 $a The language of leadership a feminist poststructural discourse analysis of inaugural addresses by presidents of high profile research universities.
300 $a 321 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Pamela L. Eddy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The College of William and Mary, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a The leadership landscape of high profile research universities has changed over the last 20 years with increasing participation of women in senior positions of leadership, including presidencies, providing the opportunity to study their rhetoric alongside their male counterparts. Using the discourse analysis approaches of Gee (2014) and Allan (2003, 2008, 2010), and Bitzer's (1992) theory of rhetorical situation, this study explored how female and male presidents of high profile research universities use rhetoric in their inaugural addresses, and to what extent, and in what ways, their rhetoric is gendered.
520 $a The discourse model that emerged from the analysis indicated that although the overall model for the inaugural addresses was almost identical for men and women, important nuanced differences were evident between their approaches to the discourse model. Similarities in the discourse model included a greater emphasis on the political aspects of discourse; moderate emphasis on identities, relationships, practices, connections, and significance; and relatively low emphasis on sign systems and knowledge. Differences indicated that women talked less about themselves, used more metaphorical language, quoted men more often, and introduced their spouses in more detail than men. Men were more likely than women to speak of power as a productive force, use religious metaphors, and quote women. The analysis indicated that presidents generally do not address the gendered status quo in their inaugural addresses. Despite leaving potentially powerful legacies for the future, women leaders face double binds (Nidiffer, 2001) in language use due to gendered structures (Acker, 1990) that persist in research universities.
590 $a School code: 0261.
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
690 $a 0449
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0446
710 2 $a The College of William and Mary. $3 1018629
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-10A(E).
790 $a 0261
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3662991