語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Groundcovers and mulches for sustain...
~
Bavougian, Christina M.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management./
作者:
Bavougian, Christina M.
面頁冊數:
115 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International75-08B(E).
標題:
Horticulture. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3618645
ISBN:
9781303870972
Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management.
Bavougian, Christina M.
Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management.
- 115 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2014.
The objectives of this research were to identify alternatives to glyphosate for in-row vineyard floor management and to evaluate the potential for in-row and alleyway groundcovers to reduce vegetative vigor of `Marquette' vines in a southeast Nebraska vineyard. The experiment was a randomized factorial design with 5 in-row treatments (crushed glass [CG], distillers' grain [DG], creeping red fescue [CRF], non-sprayed control, and glyphosate) and 3 alleyway treatments (creeping red fescue [CRF], Kentucky bluegrass [BG], and resident vegetation). Treatment plots were established in 2010-2011 and measurements were conducted during 2012 and 2013. Soil temperature was mostly higher under mulches and lower under in-row groundcovers, compared to glyphosate. Groundcovers generally had lower in-row soil water content than glyphosate; soil water content was higher under DG but lower under CG in 2013. Treatment effects on vine vigor were inconclusive. None of the treatments differed in vine water potential or shoot length. The BG and CRF alleyway treatments had higher pruning weights in 2012, compared to resident vegetation. Leaf layer number was higher in DG in-row plots, relative to glyphosate. Yield and fruit composition results were also inconclusive. In 2012 the treatments did not differ in yield, berry weight, Brix or pH. In 2013 CG and SC had higher juice Brix than CRF, and there were significant alleyway X in-row treatment interactions for yield and berry weight. In 2013 CRF and non-sprayed control fruit had lower juice pH than glyphosate, CG and DG. Titratable acidity did not differ between treatments in either year.
ISBN: 9781303870972Subjects--Topical Terms:
555447
Horticulture.
Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management.
LDR
:02536nmm a2200289 4500
001
2065865
005
20151205152710.5
008
170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781303870972
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3618645
035
$a
AAI3618645
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Bavougian, Christina M.
$3
3180607
245
1 0
$a
Groundcovers and mulches for sustainable vineyard floor management.
300
$a
115 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Adviser: Paul E. Read.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Nebraska - Lincoln, 2014.
520
$a
The objectives of this research were to identify alternatives to glyphosate for in-row vineyard floor management and to evaluate the potential for in-row and alleyway groundcovers to reduce vegetative vigor of `Marquette' vines in a southeast Nebraska vineyard. The experiment was a randomized factorial design with 5 in-row treatments (crushed glass [CG], distillers' grain [DG], creeping red fescue [CRF], non-sprayed control, and glyphosate) and 3 alleyway treatments (creeping red fescue [CRF], Kentucky bluegrass [BG], and resident vegetation). Treatment plots were established in 2010-2011 and measurements were conducted during 2012 and 2013. Soil temperature was mostly higher under mulches and lower under in-row groundcovers, compared to glyphosate. Groundcovers generally had lower in-row soil water content than glyphosate; soil water content was higher under DG but lower under CG in 2013. Treatment effects on vine vigor were inconclusive. None of the treatments differed in vine water potential or shoot length. The BG and CRF alleyway treatments had higher pruning weights in 2012, compared to resident vegetation. Leaf layer number was higher in DG in-row plots, relative to glyphosate. Yield and fruit composition results were also inconclusive. In 2012 the treatments did not differ in yield, berry weight, Brix or pH. In 2013 CG and SC had higher juice Brix than CRF, and there were significant alleyway X in-row treatment interactions for yield and berry weight. In 2013 CRF and non-sprayed control fruit had lower juice pH than glyphosate, CG and DG. Titratable acidity did not differ between treatments in either year.
590
$a
School code: 0138.
650
4
$a
Horticulture.
$3
555447
650
4
$a
Agronomy.
$3
2122783
650
4
$a
Sustainability.
$3
1029978
690
$a
0471
690
$a
0285
690
$a
0640
710
2
$a
The University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
$b
Horticulture.
$3
3180608
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
75-08B(E).
790
$a
0138
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2014
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3618645
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9298575
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入