東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Judging federalism: A full circle ac...

Hastings, Kalen Michael.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Judging federalism: A full circle account of the Supreme Court of Canada's post-Charter federalism jurisprudence.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Judging federalism: A full circle account of the Supreme Court of Canada's post-Charter federalism jurisprudence./
Author:	Hastings, Kalen Michael.
Description:	238 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International54-01(E).
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1569474
ISBN:	9781321350852

Judging federalism: A full circle account of the Supreme Court of Canada's post-Charter federalism jurisprudence.
Hastings, Kalen Michael.

Judging federalism: A full circle account of the Supreme Court of Canada's post-Charter federalism jurisprudence. - 238 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-01.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Lethbridge (Canada), 2014.

In the post-Charter era, Canada's national high court has developed a distinct political philosophy that guides the manner in which they dispose of federalism disputes. Although adherents to the "pendulum theory" of judicial review believe that federalism "balance" is created and maintained through a series of offsetting federal-provincial "wins" and "losses," I suggest that the Supreme Court's tolerance and embrace of legislative concurrency flows out of a deeper, conscious desire to facilitate intergovernmental relations in Canada. This approach is implicit in both the doctrines they apply and the policy statements they make. The Court is reluctant to declare laws invalid and avoids application of what they refer to as the "constraining" interjurisdictional immunity and paramountcy doctrines.

ISBN: 9781321350852Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.

Judging federalism: A full circle account of the Supreme Court of Canada's post-Charter federalism jurisprudence.
LDR:02443nmm a2200301 4500 001 2065119
005 20151130080043.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321350852
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1569474
035 $a AAI1569474
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hastings, Kalen Michael. $3 3179792
245 1 0 $a Judging federalism: A full circle account of the Supreme Court of Canada's post-Charter federalism jurisprudence.
300 $a 238 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 54-01.
500 $a Adviser: Peter McCormick.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Lethbridge (Canada), 2014.
520 $a In the post-Charter era, Canada's national high court has developed a distinct political philosophy that guides the manner in which they dispose of federalism disputes. Although adherents to the "pendulum theory" of judicial review believe that federalism "balance" is created and maintained through a series of offsetting federal-provincial "wins" and "losses," I suggest that the Supreme Court's tolerance and embrace of legislative concurrency flows out of a deeper, conscious desire to facilitate intergovernmental relations in Canada. This approach is implicit in both the doctrines they apply and the policy statements they make. The Court is reluctant to declare laws invalid and avoids application of what they refer to as the "constraining" interjurisdictional immunity and paramountcy doctrines.
520 $a The Supreme Court's decision-making philosophy in federalism cases is not value-free, however. While the Supreme Court's post-Charter preference for "balance" and "flexibility" reinforces the practice of intergovernmental collaboration---a political convention---it simultaneously undermines the political ideals the Fathers of Confederation intended federalism to serve. The jurisprudence of "restraint" suppresses the civic virtues that naturally emanate from a classical, originalist reading of the division of powers. In Judging Federalism I seek to bridge the gap by attempting to understand the Supreme Court's federalism case law vis-a-vis the moral underpinnings of our Constitution.
590 $a School code: 1112.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Canadian studies. $3 2122858
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0385
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a University of Lethbridge (Canada). $b Political Science. $3 3179793
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 54-01(E).
790 $a 1112
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1569474