語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Te...
~
Twomey, Amy.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Term Care: Manitoba, Ontario and the Politics of Commercialization".
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Term Care: Manitoba, Ontario and the Politics of Commercialization"./
作者:
Twomey, Amy.
面頁冊數:
251 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International76-01A(E).
標題:
Public policy. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3634194
ISBN:
9781321144383
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Term Care: Manitoba, Ontario and the Politics of Commercialization".
Twomey, Amy.
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Term Care: Manitoba, Ontario and the Politics of Commercialization".
- 251 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Trent University (Canada), 2014.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Because federal funding for long-term care was not included as part of Canada's publicly-funded universal health care system, provincial governments have been free to determine how much, or how little, they will rely on the for-profit sector to meet the long-term care needs of their senior populations. The proportion of beds in the for-profit sector differs in each province, demonstrating that policy approaches to this type of care have developed according to distinct provincial political contexts. In this dissertation I explain why governments in two provinces, Manitoba and Ontario, have come to rely on the proprietary sector to markedly different degrees. While in the federation Manitoba stands out for its restrained reliance on this form of care, Ontario stands out for its exceptional dependence on commercial provision. In the chapters that follow I employ an historical institutionalist framework of analysis to explain why these neighbouring provinces initially pursued different policy paths in long-term care and how these paths have been sustained over time.
ISBN: 9781321144383Subjects--Topical Terms:
532803
Public policy.
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Term Care: Manitoba, Ontario and the Politics of Commercialization".
LDR
:03905nmm a2200349 4500
001
2063193
005
20151027100335.5
008
170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321144383
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3634194
035
$a
AAI3634194
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Twomey, Amy.
$3
3177692
245
1 0
$a
"Pursuing Different Paths in Long-Term Care: Manitoba, Ontario and the Politics of Commercialization".
300
$a
251 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: James Struthers.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Trent University (Canada), 2014.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506
$a
This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520
$a
Because federal funding for long-term care was not included as part of Canada's publicly-funded universal health care system, provincial governments have been free to determine how much, or how little, they will rely on the for-profit sector to meet the long-term care needs of their senior populations. The proportion of beds in the for-profit sector differs in each province, demonstrating that policy approaches to this type of care have developed according to distinct provincial political contexts. In this dissertation I explain why governments in two provinces, Manitoba and Ontario, have come to rely on the proprietary sector to markedly different degrees. While in the federation Manitoba stands out for its restrained reliance on this form of care, Ontario stands out for its exceptional dependence on commercial provision. In the chapters that follow I employ an historical institutionalist framework of analysis to explain why these neighbouring provinces initially pursued different policy paths in long-term care and how these paths have been sustained over time.
520
$a
Following an introductory chapter in which I explain the reasons for the marginalization of long-term care within national health policy making, I provide in-depth analysis of these case studies in policy divergence. I argue that contemporary policy differences between these neighbouring provinces cannot be understood in isolation from long-term historical processes. Focusing largely on the period from the 1960s to the 1990s, I emphasize that present differences in ownership are a reflection of the different constellation of actors, events, ideas and institutions that came together at critical junctures in time, and the lasting legacies that these early windows of opportunity for reform have had on subsequent rounds of long-term care policy-making. In each province, diverging ideas about the appropriate role of the for-profit sector in meeting the long-term care needs of an aging population rose to prominence on the political agenda. Over time, rigidities developed in each system, making it difficult for actors advocating for new directions in ownership to realize their ambitions.
520
$a
In both provinces policies put in place at earlier times greatly influenced future political dynamics, altered the guiding principles of government departments and policy makers, provided incentives for different interest group formations, and led to contrasting public expectations about the proper balance of the for-profit and non-profit sectors in long-term care provision. I conclude this dissertation by arguing that its findings can contribute in important ways to present discussions about long-term care reform in Canada generally and about the future role of for-profit providers specifically.
590
$a
School code: 0513.
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
532803
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
Canadian studies.
$3
2122858
650
4
$a
Health care management.
$3
2122906
690
$a
0630
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0385
690
$a
0769
710
2
$a
Trent University (Canada).
$b
Canadian Studies.
$3
3175350
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
76-01A(E).
790
$a
0513
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2014
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3634194
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9295851
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入