東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Social Movements, Media, and Democra...

Mikashavidze, Maia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Social Movements, Media, and Democratization in Georgia.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Social Movements, Media, and Democratization in Georgia./
作者:	Mikashavidze, Maia.
面頁冊數:	212 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-01A(E).
標題:	Mass communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3634872
ISBN:	9781321156034

Social Movements, Media, and Democratization in Georgia.
Mikashavidze, Maia.

Social Movements, Media, and Democratization in Georgia. - 212 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

A purpose of the study was to analyze the construction of reality around the Georgian media democratization movement in the years 2010 through 2012. A qualitative analysis of movement statements (n=17) and in-depth interviews with movement activists (n=12) found that the movement relied on mobilizing master frames linked to the concept of democracy: free speech, access to information, fair elections, transparency, plurality, and devised an innovative frame, it concerns you. The movement pursued two goals with its framing efforts: improvements in the media environment and mobilization of citizen participation.

ISBN: 9781321156034Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144804
Mass communication.

Social Movements, Media, and Democratization in Georgia.
LDR:03423nmm a2200313 4500 001 2062954
005 20151024095833.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321156034
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3634872
035 $a AAI3634872
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mikashavidze, Maia. $3 3177406
245 1 0 $a Social Movements, Media, and Democratization in Georgia.
300 $a 212 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Kathy Roberts Forde; Sei-Hill Kim.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Carolina, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a A purpose of the study was to analyze the construction of reality around the Georgian media democratization movement in the years 2010 through 2012. A qualitative analysis of movement statements (n=17) and in-depth interviews with movement activists (n=12) found that the movement relied on mobilizing master frames linked to the concept of democracy: free speech, access to information, fair elections, transparency, plurality, and devised an innovative frame, it concerns you. The movement pursued two goals with its framing efforts: improvements in the media environment and mobilization of citizen participation.
520 $a A quantitative analysis of news stories about the movement (n=552) by six pro-opposition, pro-government, and independent news organizations found that the news organizations used movement-advanced frames, and, in general, used more mobilizing than demobilizing frames. The marginalization of the movement, a dominant mode of news coverage of social movements based on the literature, did not occur. However, the study found differences in coverage based on news organizations' ties with the government and the opposition, or the lack thereof. Pro-opposition and independent TV stations covered the movement more frequently, aired reports at better viewing times, used more mobilizing frames, and gave greater voice to the activists and their key frame, "it concerns you." The pro-opposition newspaper used a more positive tone and lengthier stories, and the independent newspaper more frequent coverage and activists as sources, while the pro-government newspaper featured the coverage more prominently and used the it concerns you frame. Both pro-government news organizations used government sources twice as often as other news organizations, and focused on those movement issues that were eventually endorsed by the government.
520 $a In-depth interviews with news journalists (n=5) in these news organizations found that journalists in the pro-opposition and independent press supported movement issues, and engaged in supportive reporting, and thought it was acceptable for journalists to engage in advocacy reporting when press freedoms were in danger. Journalists in pro-government media supported most of the movement's demands, but were suspicious of political motives behind movement activism (the movement mobilized ahead of the Parliamentary Elections 2012) and did not engage in and disapproved of advocacy reporting.
590 $a School code: 0202.
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Slavic studies. $3 3171903
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0614
710 2 $a University of South Carolina. $b Journalism and Mass Communications. $3 1677364
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-01A(E).
790 $a 0202
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3634872