東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Clinical and counseling psychology g...

Hardy, Elizabeth Anne.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Clinical and counseling psychology graduate student and postdoctorate supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Clinical and counseling psychology graduate student and postdoctorate supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship./
作者:	Hardy, Elizabeth Anne.
面頁冊數:	281 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: B, page: 4967.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International72-08B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454654
ISBN:	9781124645216

Clinical and counseling psychology graduate student and postdoctorate supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship.
Hardy, Elizabeth Anne.

Clinical and counseling psychology graduate student and postdoctorate supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship. - 281 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: B, page: 4967.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2011.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

There is very little research on supervisory boundary violations even though most psychology professionals agree supervision is the most important means by which trainees develop as clinicians and learn how to conduct psychotherapy. Most related literature explores boundary violations between psychotherapists and patients or educators and students. Many focus exclusively on sexual boundary violations. This mixed design study explored supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship. Eighty-four (practicum, internship, and postdoctoral) supervisees completed a questionnaire answering questions about background information and clinical training experience, provided boundary crossing and boundary violation definitions and vignette ratings, and rated and described personal experience of supervisory boundary violations and consequent effects. One third of the participants reported experiencing a supervisory boundary violation and the vast majority reported they told someone about it. For most of these people, telling someone was helpful; however, too often, little or nothing was done to address unethical behavior. Most who reported experiencing a supervisory boundary violation reported profoundly negative effects on themselves, the supervisory relationship, work with subsequent supervisors, and patient care. Nearly half this sample reported they knew peer supervisees who had experienced a supervisory boundary violation, also with negative consequences. The number of ethics courses/seminars taken and familiarity with the American Psychological Association Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002) did not appear to protect supervisees from experiencing a supervisory boundary violation, in large part because they are not responsible for maintaining the boundaries. Clearly, knowledge and awareness are not enough to ensure psychology trainees' safety, nor do they necessarily empower them to deal with boundary violations that may occur. This investigation of supervisory boundary violations serves to advance knowledge about this important, relatively little-addressed, ethics problem and should have meaningful implications for clinical training.

ISBN: 9781124645216Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.

Clinical and counseling psychology graduate student and postdoctorate supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship.
LDR:03352nmm a2200301 4500 001 2062401
005 20151023075759.5
008 170521s2011 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124645216
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3454654
035 $a AAI3454654
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hardy, Elizabeth Anne. $3 3176780
245 1 0 $a Clinical and counseling psychology graduate student and postdoctorate supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship.
300 $a 281 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: B, page: 4967.
500 $a Adviser: Sherry L. Hatcher.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Fielding Graduate University, 2011.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a There is very little research on supervisory boundary violations even though most psychology professionals agree supervision is the most important means by which trainees develop as clinicians and learn how to conduct psychotherapy. Most related literature explores boundary violations between psychotherapists and patients or educators and students. Many focus exclusively on sexual boundary violations. This mixed design study explored supervisees' perceptions and experiences of boundary crossings and boundary violations in the supervisory relationship. Eighty-four (practicum, internship, and postdoctoral) supervisees completed a questionnaire answering questions about background information and clinical training experience, provided boundary crossing and boundary violation definitions and vignette ratings, and rated and described personal experience of supervisory boundary violations and consequent effects. One third of the participants reported experiencing a supervisory boundary violation and the vast majority reported they told someone about it. For most of these people, telling someone was helpful; however, too often, little or nothing was done to address unethical behavior. Most who reported experiencing a supervisory boundary violation reported profoundly negative effects on themselves, the supervisory relationship, work with subsequent supervisors, and patient care. Nearly half this sample reported they knew peer supervisees who had experienced a supervisory boundary violation, also with negative consequences. The number of ethics courses/seminars taken and familiarity with the American Psychological Association Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002) did not appear to protect supervisees from experiencing a supervisory boundary violation, in large part because they are not responsible for maintaining the boundaries. Clearly, knowledge and awareness are not enough to ensure psychology trainees' safety, nor do they necessarily empower them to deal with boundary violations that may occur. This investigation of supervisory boundary violations serves to advance knowledge about this important, relatively little-addressed, ethics problem and should have meaningful implications for clinical training.
590 $a School code: 1503.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Counseling Psychology. $3 2122842
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0603
710 2 $a Fielding Graduate University. $b The School of Psychology. $3 1669722
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 72-08B.
790 $a 1503
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2011
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3454654