東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Exploring trends in disproportionali...

Alazar, Ghirmay.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA)./
作者:	Alazar, Ghirmay.
面頁冊數:	143 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-09A(E).
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3689539
ISBN:	9781321690071

Exploring trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA).
Alazar, Ghirmay.

Exploring trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA). - 143 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Denver, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the trends of disproportionate representation of African American students in special education when compared to Caucasian special education students in emotional disturbance category as well as the trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA). African American students in special education are disproportionately represented when compared to Caucasian special education students but uncertainty persists regarding the nature and the extent of the problem (Aud et al., 2010; Countinho & Oswald, 2002; Skiba et al., 2006, 2008). This study employed a mixed methods multiple case analysis to examine changes in student data trends before and after implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Using national data from the Office of Special Education Programs from 2000--2011 on students with emotional disturbance, the study used an Interrupted Time Series (ITS) design to explore disproportionality trends after IDEIA implementation. To explore implementation, the researcher selected six states that represented a range of student data trends regarding ED classification and examined their policies and practice.

ISBN: 9781321690071Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.

Exploring trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA).
LDR:03698nmm a2200337 4500 001 2062154
005 20151020081604.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321690071
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3689539
035 $a AAI3689539
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alazar, Ghirmay. $3 3176512
245 1 0 $a Exploring trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA).
300 $a 143 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Susan Korach.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Denver, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the trends of disproportionate representation of African American students in special education when compared to Caucasian special education students in emotional disturbance category as well as the trends in disproportionality of emotional disturbance classification after the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA). African American students in special education are disproportionately represented when compared to Caucasian special education students but uncertainty persists regarding the nature and the extent of the problem (Aud et al., 2010; Countinho & Oswald, 2002; Skiba et al., 2006, 2008). This study employed a mixed methods multiple case analysis to examine changes in student data trends before and after implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Using national data from the Office of Special Education Programs from 2000--2011 on students with emotional disturbance, the study used an Interrupted Time Series (ITS) design to explore disproportionality trends after IDEIA implementation. To explore implementation, the researcher selected six states that represented a range of student data trends regarding ED classification and examined their policies and practice.
520 $a The quantitative results revealed that since the implementation of the IDEIA the identification trends of African-American and Caucasian students with emotional disturbance decreased noticeably. Conversely, the data displayed that the trend of the Caucasian students identified as emotionally disturbed decreased significantly, the coefficient was -162.36 units p<.001; but the trend for the African-American students with ED only decreased by -78.91 units p<.001. The qualitative data analysis revealed that there was great variability with each state's interpretation and implementation of the IDEIA policy. Also, the qualitative data analysis identified several identical practices for states with positive trend changes.
520 $a Multiple studies have indicated that disproportionality continue to be a persistent, recurring dilemma in public education for nearly four decades (Artiles & Bal, 2008; Aud et al., 2010; Countinho & Oswald, 2000 Hosp & Reschly, 2004). The findings of this study both support this research and offer guidance to policy makers and educational leaders to improve policy implementation. The patterns and trends derived from the data and examined in this study confirm that educational policy and practice is only as effective as its systems of enforcement, monitoring, and conservation.
590 $a School code: 0061.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a African American studies. $3 2122686
650 4 $a Black studies. $3 2122689
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0296
690 $a 0325
710 2 $a University of Denver. $b Educational Administration and Policy Studies. $3 1024101
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-09A(E).
790 $a 0061
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3689539