東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Usage error in technical communication.

Flanagan, Suzan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Usage error in technical communication.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Usage error in technical communication./
作者:	Flanagan, Suzan.
面頁冊數:	117 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International53-02(E).
標題:	Technical communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1558809
ISBN:	9781303991547

Usage error in technical communication.
Flanagan, Suzan.

Usage error in technical communication. - 117 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--East Carolina University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

College students who seek careers as technical communicators must master technical writing and editing skills to succeed in the workplace. Effective technical communication stems from the communicator's ability to perceive usage errors in documents; therefore, this research study examined students' abilities to detect errors commonly found in technical editing tests. A convenience sample of East Carolina University students enrolled in English Composition served as the control group, and students enrolled in technical communication-related courses served as the cluster group. The research study entailed a brief demographic survey followed by a quasi-experiment that consisted of an editing test. The 1,000-word editing test introduced 60 errors into excerpted technical communication documents; some sentences contained multiple errors, while others were error free. The students in this small-scale study detected few of the types of usage errors found on editing tests. The results indicate that (1) Electronic editing tools detect few usage errors, (2) Students in the study group do not perceive most style-related usage errors as errors, and (3) The placement of usage errors may affect error perception. Repeating the study with a larger, randomized sample could yield findings generalizable to technical writing and editing practices and to technical communication pedagogy.

ISBN: 9781303991547Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172863
Technical communication.

Usage error in technical communication.
LDR:02368nmm a2200313 4500 001 2061727
005 20151020075126.5
008 170521s2014 eng d
020 $a 9781303991547
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1558809
035 $a AAI1558809
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Flanagan, Suzan. $3 3176019
245 1 0 $a Usage error in technical communication.
300 $a 117 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-02.
500 $a Adviser: Michael Albers.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--East Carolina University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a College students who seek careers as technical communicators must master technical writing and editing skills to succeed in the workplace. Effective technical communication stems from the communicator's ability to perceive usage errors in documents; therefore, this research study examined students' abilities to detect errors commonly found in technical editing tests. A convenience sample of East Carolina University students enrolled in English Composition served as the control group, and students enrolled in technical communication-related courses served as the cluster group. The research study entailed a brief demographic survey followed by a quasi-experiment that consisted of an editing test. The 1,000-word editing test introduced 60 errors into excerpted technical communication documents; some sentences contained multiple errors, while others were error free. The students in this small-scale study detected few of the types of usage errors found on editing tests. The results indicate that (1) Electronic editing tools detect few usage errors, (2) Students in the study group do not perceive most style-related usage errors as errors, and (3) The placement of usage errors may affect error perception. Repeating the study with a larger, randomized sample could yield findings generalizable to technical writing and editing practices and to technical communication pedagogy.
590 $a School code: 0600.
650 4 $a Technical communication. $3 3172863
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
690 $a 0643
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0679
710 2 0 $a East Carolina University. $b English. $3 3172048
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 53-02(E).
790 $a 0600
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1558809