東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The impact of institutional and peer...

Ju, Ming.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions./
作者:	Ju, Ming.
面頁冊數:	147 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: 3923.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-11A.
標題:	Higher education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3428719
ISBN:	9781124266633

The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions.
Ju, Ming.

The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions. - 147 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: 3923.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2010.

Across the landscape of American higher education, research has gradually established its dominant role in faculty work since the end of WWII---a paradigm shift yet to be fully studied and understood. Situated on their traditional locales on the spectrum stretching from pure teaching to heavy research, contemporary institutions all attempt to be involved in research activities. Research productivity, an essential contributor to the improvement of society and mankind, becomes the iconic indicator for institutional prestige, one of the vital resources any higher education institution requires for maintaining operation and facilitating development and growth. Responsively, an institutionalized recruitment and reward system unanimously sets the requirement for research productivity to allow faculty members to move through the academic pipeline. This study is aimed at identifying influential factors that may lead to higher research productivity at research and non-research institutions respectively by analyzing the data collected from the CAP (Changing Academic Profession) survey.

ISBN: 9781124266633Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.

The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions.
LDR:02888nmm a2200289 4500 001 2061364
005 20150930092159.5
008 170521s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124266633
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3428719
035 $a AAI3428719
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ju, Ming. $3 3175620
245 1 4 $a The impact of institutional and peer support on faculty research productivity: A comparative analysis of research vs. non-research institutions.
300 $a 147 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-11, Section: A, page: 3923.
500 $a Adviser: Martin Finkelstein.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2010.
520 $a Across the landscape of American higher education, research has gradually established its dominant role in faculty work since the end of WWII---a paradigm shift yet to be fully studied and understood. Situated on their traditional locales on the spectrum stretching from pure teaching to heavy research, contemporary institutions all attempt to be involved in research activities. Research productivity, an essential contributor to the improvement of society and mankind, becomes the iconic indicator for institutional prestige, one of the vital resources any higher education institution requires for maintaining operation and facilitating development and growth. Responsively, an institutionalized recruitment and reward system unanimously sets the requirement for research productivity to allow faculty members to move through the academic pipeline. This study is aimed at identifying influential factors that may lead to higher research productivity at research and non-research institutions respectively by analyzing the data collected from the CAP (Changing Academic Profession) survey.
520 $a The logistic regression models have revealed four major findings. First, at research and non-research institutions, faculty collaboration with either domestic or international colleagues is essential for research productivity. Second, faculty collaboration with international colleagues is the best predictor of research productivity among all the factors included in the study (faculty professional characteristics, administration support research, peer support research). Third, faculty preferences in research lead to higher research productivity at research institutions, but not apparently at non-research institutions. Fourth, administration generally plays no role in improving research productivity; nonetheless, it may play a marginal role at non-research institutions if peer collaboration is neither counted nor present.
590 $a School code: 0199.
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0514
710 2 $a Seton Hall University. $3 1026097
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-11A.
790 $a 0199
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3428719