東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Environmental governance: Conservati...

Tester, Aaron W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Environmental governance: Conservation easements and the social meaning of property.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Environmental governance: Conservation easements and the social meaning of property./
作者:	Tester, Aaron W.
面頁冊數:	150 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-02(E).
標題:	Environmental justice. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1544098
ISBN:	9781303334771

Environmental governance: Conservation easements and the social meaning of property.
Tester, Aaron W.

Environmental governance: Conservation easements and the social meaning of property. - 150 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Illinois State University, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

This study investigated whether the social meaning of private property is shifting to meet the challenges of global environmental change through the lens of ecological modernization theory. Ecological modernization posits that environmental reforms in the core institutions of society are facilitated through political modernization---a concept that signifies the decentralization of governing capacities. To explore whether the institution of private property changes according to this logic I examined conservation easements. Easements offered a compelling case to examine how the social meaning of property and environmental considerations interact: In the last several decades, conservation easements have become a key strategy for protecting the environment on private lands. Now, easements have been critiqued by a range of scholars and their findings suggest that conservation easement policies are in need of substantive reforms. Still, many in the conservation community have not acted on these challenges because, in part, many landowners are wary of intrusions on their private property rights. To deepen our understanding of these issues I interviewed 24 landowners who donated conservation easements on their respective properties. I found that the decentralization of governing capacities does not inspire institutional reform, indicating that the social meaning of property is not substantively changing to confront global environmental change. In addition, these findings contribute to debates over easement policy reform and I offer recommendations for future research.

ISBN: 9781303334771Subjects--Topical Terms:

528369
Environmental justice.

Environmental governance: Conservation easements and the social meaning of property.
LDR:02629nmm a2200313 4500 001 2060828
005 20150918092317.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303334771
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1544098
035 $a AAI1544098
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Tester, Aaron W. $3 3175017
245 1 0 $a Environmental governance: Conservation easements and the social meaning of property.
300 $a 150 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-02.
500 $a Advisers: Joan Brehm; Michael Dougherty.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Illinois State University, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study investigated whether the social meaning of private property is shifting to meet the challenges of global environmental change through the lens of ecological modernization theory. Ecological modernization posits that environmental reforms in the core institutions of society are facilitated through political modernization---a concept that signifies the decentralization of governing capacities. To explore whether the institution of private property changes according to this logic I examined conservation easements. Easements offered a compelling case to examine how the social meaning of property and environmental considerations interact: In the last several decades, conservation easements have become a key strategy for protecting the environment on private lands. Now, easements have been critiqued by a range of scholars and their findings suggest that conservation easement policies are in need of substantive reforms. Still, many in the conservation community have not acted on these challenges because, in part, many landowners are wary of intrusions on their private property rights. To deepen our understanding of these issues I interviewed 24 landowners who donated conservation easements on their respective properties. I found that the decentralization of governing capacities does not inspire institutional reform, indicating that the social meaning of property is not substantively changing to confront global environmental change. In addition, these findings contribute to debates over easement policy reform and I offer recommendations for future research.
590 $a School code: 0092.
650 4 $a Environmental justice. $3 528369
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
690 $a 0619
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a Illinois State University. $b Sociology and Anthropology: Sociology. $3 3175018
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-02(E).
790 $a 0092
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1544098