東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Legal Philosophies of Religious ...

Kaye, Alexander.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937--1967.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937--1967./
作者:	Kaye, Alexander.
面頁冊數:	292 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-04A(E).
標題:	Modern history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3545469
ISBN:	9781267777430

The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937--1967.
Kaye, Alexander.

The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937--1967. - 292 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

This dissertation is an attempt to recover abandoned pathways in religious Zionist thought. It identifies a fundamental shift in the legal philosophy of religious Zionists, demonstrating that around the time of the establishment of the State of Israel, religious Zionists developed a new way of thinking about the relationship between law and the state.

ISBN: 9781267777430Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122829
Modern history.

The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937--1967.
LDR:04310nmm a2200361 4500 001 2059739
005 20150827082947.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267777430
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3545469
035 $a AAI3545469
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kaye, Alexander. $3 3173859
245 1 4 $a The Legal Philosophies of Religious Zionism 1937--1967.
300 $a 292 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michael F. Stanislawski.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This dissertation is an attempt to recover abandoned pathways in religious Zionist thought. It identifies a fundamental shift in the legal philosophy of religious Zionists, demonstrating that around the time of the establishment of the State of Israel, religious Zionists developed a new way of thinking about the relationship between law and the state.
520 $a Before this shift took place, religious Zionist thinkers affiliated with a variety of legal and constitutional philosophies. As shown in chapter 1, the leaders of the religious kibbutz movement advocated a revolutionary, almost anarchic, approach to law. They (in theory, at least) only accepted rules that emerged spontaneously from the spirit of their religious and national life, even if that meant departing from traditional halakha. Others had a more positive attitude towards law but, as chapter 2 shows, differed widely regarding the role of halakha in the constitution of the Jewish state. They covered a spectrum from, at one extreme, the call for a complete separation between religion and state to, on the other, the call a rabbinic oversight of all legislation. They all, however, were legal pluralists; they agreed that a single polity may have within it a plurality of legitimate sources of legal authority and that, even in a Jewish state, other kinds of legislation may hold authority alongside halakha.
520 $a In the late 1940s, this wide variety of legal pluralisms in the religious Zionist camp was replaced by a new legal philosophy: legal centralism. This doctrine maintained that all legal authority in the state must derive from a single source of authority, in this case halakha. As chapters 3 and 4 demonstrate, this shift was associated strongly with the first Ashkenazic chief rabbi of Israel, Isaac Herzog, whose scholarly life had been dedicated in large part to portraying the sources of Jewish law according to the image of state-centered jurisprudence that was valorized by modern legal scholars in Britain and in Palestine. Chapters 5 and 6 make clear that Herzog was not the only figure to adopt this position. It became so influential among religious Zionist leaders that it molded their constitutional fantasies, determined the way they represented themselves to the state and guided the construction of the new system of rabbinical courts.
520 $a As well as identifying the shift from legal pluralism to legal centralism, this dissertation attempts to uncover its origins. Through a close reading of rabbinical court records, constitutional pamphlets, speeches, journal articles and halakhic decisions, it traces trends in religious Zionist legal philosophy to modern European jurisprudence. In particular, it demonstrates the influence of British and German jurisprudence on the thinking of religious Zionists. It also places religious Zionist jurisprudence in the context of the legal philosophy of other twentieth-century nationalisms. In so doing, it sheds new light on the conflicts between religious and secular Zionism and on the way that religious Zionists throughout the history of Israel have understood their relationship to the law and politics of the Jewish state.
590 $a School code: 0054.
650 4 $a Modern history. $3 2122829
650 4 $a Judaic studies. $3 2144743
650 4 $a Religious history. $3 2122824
690 $a 0582
690 $a 0751
690 $a 0320
710 2 $a Columbia University. $b History. $3 2093946
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-04A(E).
790 $a 0054
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3545469