東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Co...

Sturm, Melanie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Conservation Markets for Wildlife.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Conservation Markets for Wildlife./
作者:	Sturm, Melanie.
面頁冊數:	82 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-06(E).
標題:	Natural resource management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1555939
ISBN:	9781303894473

A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Conservation Markets for Wildlife.
Sturm, Melanie.

A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Conservation Markets for Wildlife. - 82 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06.

Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Many wildlife species that are essential to human livelihoods are targeted with the aim of extracting short-term benefits. Overexploitation, resulting from failed common-pool resource governance, has endangered the sustainability of large animal species, in particular. Rights-based approaches to wildlife conservation offer a possible path forward. In a wildlife market, property rights, or shares of an animal population, are allocated to resource users with interests in either harvest or preservation. Here, I apply the Social-Ecological Systems (SES) framework (Ostrom, 2009) to identify the conditions under which the ecological, social, and economic outcomes of a conservation market are improved compared to the status quo. I first consider three case studies (Bighorn sheep, white rhino, and Atlantic Bluefin tuna) all of which employ different market mechanisms. Based on the SES framework and these case studies, I then evaluate whether markets are a feasible management option for other socially and ecologically significant species, such as whales (and similar highly migratory species), and whether market instruments are capable of accommodating non-consumptive environmental values in natural resource decision making. My results suggest that spatial and temporal distribution, ethical and cultural relevance, and institutional histories compatible with commodification of wildlife are key SES subsystem variables. Successful conservation markets for cross-boundary marine species, such as whales, sea turtles, and sharks, will require intergovernmental agreements.

ISBN: 9781303894473Subjects--Topical Terms:

589570
Natural resource management.

A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Conservation Markets for Wildlife.
LDR:02547nmm a2200313 4500 001 2058471
005 20150716112035.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303894473
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1555939
035 $a AAI1555939
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sturm, Melanie. $3 3172422
245 1 2 $a A Social-Ecological Evaluation of Conservation Markets for Wildlife.
300 $a 82 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-06.
500 $a Advisers: Ben A. Minteer; Leah R. Gerber.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Arizona State University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Many wildlife species that are essential to human livelihoods are targeted with the aim of extracting short-term benefits. Overexploitation, resulting from failed common-pool resource governance, has endangered the sustainability of large animal species, in particular. Rights-based approaches to wildlife conservation offer a possible path forward. In a wildlife market, property rights, or shares of an animal population, are allocated to resource users with interests in either harvest or preservation. Here, I apply the Social-Ecological Systems (SES) framework (Ostrom, 2009) to identify the conditions under which the ecological, social, and economic outcomes of a conservation market are improved compared to the status quo. I first consider three case studies (Bighorn sheep, white rhino, and Atlantic Bluefin tuna) all of which employ different market mechanisms. Based on the SES framework and these case studies, I then evaluate whether markets are a feasible management option for other socially and ecologically significant species, such as whales (and similar highly migratory species), and whether market instruments are capable of accommodating non-consumptive environmental values in natural resource decision making. My results suggest that spatial and temporal distribution, ethical and cultural relevance, and institutional histories compatible with commodification of wildlife are key SES subsystem variables. Successful conservation markets for cross-boundary marine species, such as whales, sea turtles, and sharks, will require intergovernmental agreements.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Conservation biology. $3 535736
650 4 $a Wildlife conservation. $2 fast $3 542165
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0408
690 $a 0284
690 $a 0329
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Biology. $3 1673500
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-06(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1555939