東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Development and Validation of a ...

Herrell, Katherine A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Development and Validation of a Rubric to Enhance Performer Feedback for Undergraduate Vocal Solo Performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Development and Validation of a Rubric to Enhance Performer Feedback for Undergraduate Vocal Solo Performance./
作者:	Herrell, Katherine A.
面頁冊數:	176 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-08A(E).
標題:	Education, Music. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3619164
ISBN:	9781303879067

The Development and Validation of a Rubric to Enhance Performer Feedback for Undergraduate Vocal Solo Performance.
Herrell, Katherine A.

The Development and Validation of a Rubric to Enhance Performer Feedback for Undergraduate Vocal Solo Performance. - 176 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Lindenwood University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This is a study of the development and validation of a rubric to enhance performer feedback for undergraduate vocal solo performance. In the literature, assessment of vocal performance is under-represented, and the value of feedback from the assessment of musical performances, from the point of view of the performer, is nonexistent. The research questions guiding this study were 1) What are the appropriate performance criteria, learning outcomes, and meaningful descriptors for various levels of proficiency for undergraduate solo vocal performance? and 2) How do students perceive their use of the feedback from the solo vocal performance rubric to improve future performances? The three groups of stakeholders of the project were voice professors from the research institution who assisted in the development of the rubric; students from the research institution who provided performance excerpts and shared their perceptions about the quality of the feedback; and voice professors from outside the research institution who used the rubric to assess the student performances. Mixed-methods participatory action research was the method used to conduct the study.

ISBN: 9781303879067Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017808
Education, Music.

The Development and Validation of a Rubric to Enhance Performer Feedback for Undergraduate Vocal Solo Performance.
LDR:03449nmm a2200313 4500 001 2057722
005 20150619125623.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303879067
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3619164
035 $a AAI3619164
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Herrell, Katherine A. $3 3171603
245 1 4 $a The Development and Validation of a Rubric to Enhance Performer Feedback for Undergraduate Vocal Solo Performance.
300 $a 176 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Susan Isenberg.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Lindenwood University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This is a study of the development and validation of a rubric to enhance performer feedback for undergraduate vocal solo performance. In the literature, assessment of vocal performance is under-represented, and the value of feedback from the assessment of musical performances, from the point of view of the performer, is nonexistent. The research questions guiding this study were 1) What are the appropriate performance criteria, learning outcomes, and meaningful descriptors for various levels of proficiency for undergraduate solo vocal performance? and 2) How do students perceive their use of the feedback from the solo vocal performance rubric to improve future performances? The three groups of stakeholders of the project were voice professors from the research institution who assisted in the development of the rubric; students from the research institution who provided performance excerpts and shared their perceptions about the quality of the feedback; and voice professors from outside the research institution who used the rubric to assess the student performances. Mixed-methods participatory action research was the method used to conduct the study.
520 $a Interviews with five experts aided the development of a criteria-specific rubric, which defined performance criteria, learning outcomes, and meaningful descriptors for various levels of proficiency for undergraduate students of singing. The rubric was distributed, along with 20 recordings comprised of 14 students, two professionals, and four repeated student performances, to voice professors who used the rubric to score the performances and provided feedback about the instrument as well as the process. Results of scoring were shared with student performers and interviews conducted about usefulness of the feedback. Seven themes emerged from the research analysis: a) levels of proficiency, b) performance criteria, c) descriptors, d) numerical scoring, e) comments, f) recording method, and g) song selection relative to the skill level of the singers. Results of the study determined that the rubric was statistically reliable, and the students received valuable feedback that validated their own self-perceptions and assisted them in long- and short-term goal setting. Practitioners may benefit from further research that explores the validity of the rubric when assigning a grade, assessing live performances, and including additional repertoire.
590 $a School code: 0573.
650 4 $a Education, Music. $3 1017808
650 4 $a Education, Higher. $3 543175
650 4 $a Education, Performing Arts. $3 1674506
690 $a 0522
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0457
710 2 $a Lindenwood University. $b Education. $3 1032459
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-08A(E).
790 $a 0573
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3619164