東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Did I say this land is your land? Pa...

Innes, Tara.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Did I say this land is your land? Patterns of contention in Indonesian environmental disputes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Did I say this land is your land? Patterns of contention in Indonesian environmental disputes./
作者:	Innes, Tara.
面頁冊數:	238 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-11A(E).
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3627646
ISBN:	9781321030587

Did I say this land is your land? Patterns of contention in Indonesian environmental disputes.
Innes, Tara.

Did I say this land is your land? Patterns of contention in Indonesian environmental disputes. - 238 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Environmental disputes occur frequently, particularly in contexts of poor natural resource management and vague law, but while some of these disputes end quickly without fatalities, some escalate to violence or become persistent contentious juggernauts that are increasingly hard to end. What makes a sequence of contentious events more likely to escalate to violence or persistent contention? This dissertation argues that strategic interactions in the form of violence, government behavior, and scarcity type signal the likelihood that the government will support claimant demands, and thus determine whether desperate claimants must escalate to maintain access to environmental goods and services necessary for survival. I also argue that there are material constraints from current repression and violence, and that timing matters. I test these propositions in two sets of logistic regressions, using new sub-national data from Indonesia and an in-depth case study. I find empirical support for the claims that prior violence, structural scarcity, and past government repression increase the likelihood of continued contention. The same variables except for past government repression also increase the likelihood of violence. Current government repression reduced the likelihood of both violence and continued contention, but as time passed it exerted a more pernicious effect on violence and resolution. In other words, timing mattered, although dense events were surprisingly less likely to yield violence or continued contention. This project indicated that there are significant opportunities for reducing the likelihood of violence and persistent contention through policy changes, potentially reducing the suffering of individuals, the destruction of natural environments, and drains on the capability of the state.

ISBN: 9781321030587Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Did I say this land is your land? Patterns of contention in Indonesian environmental disputes.
LDR:02844nmm a2200313 4500 001 2057540
005 20150610075026.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321030587
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3627646
035 $a AAI3627646
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Innes, Tara. $3 3171400
245 1 0 $a Did I say this land is your land? Patterns of contention in Indonesian environmental disputes.
300 $a 238 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-11(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Virginia Haufler.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Environmental disputes occur frequently, particularly in contexts of poor natural resource management and vague law, but while some of these disputes end quickly without fatalities, some escalate to violence or become persistent contentious juggernauts that are increasingly hard to end. What makes a sequence of contentious events more likely to escalate to violence or persistent contention? This dissertation argues that strategic interactions in the form of violence, government behavior, and scarcity type signal the likelihood that the government will support claimant demands, and thus determine whether desperate claimants must escalate to maintain access to environmental goods and services necessary for survival. I also argue that there are material constraints from current repression and violence, and that timing matters. I test these propositions in two sets of logistic regressions, using new sub-national data from Indonesia and an in-depth case study. I find empirical support for the claims that prior violence, structural scarcity, and past government repression increase the likelihood of continued contention. The same variables except for past government repression also increase the likelihood of violence. Current government repression reduced the likelihood of both violence and continued contention, but as time passed it exerted a more pernicious effect on violence and resolution. In other words, timing mattered, although dense events were surprisingly less likely to yield violence or continued contention. This project indicated that there are significant opportunities for reducing the likelihood of violence and persistent contention through policy changes, potentially reducing the suffering of individuals, the destruction of natural environments, and drains on the capability of the state.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Political Science, International Relations. $3 1669648
650 4 $a Environmental Studies. $3 1669635
650 4 $a Pacific Rim Studies. $3 1670230
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0561
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Government and Politics. $3 1022314
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-11A(E).
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3627646