東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Examination of the "Implicitness" of...

Shaw, Megan N.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examination of the "Implicitness" of the Anchored Measure of Conscientiousness.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Examination of the "Implicitness" of the Anchored Measure of Conscientiousness./
Author:	Shaw, Megan N.
Description:	145 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-03B(E).
Subject:	Psychology, Industrial. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3643001
ISBN:	9781321302646

Examination of the "Implicitness" of the Anchored Measure of Conscientiousness.
Shaw, Megan N.

Examination of the "Implicitness" of the Anchored Measure of Conscientiousness. - 145 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2015.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Over the past two decades, there has been a growing interest in using measures of implicit personality for selection purposes. The enthusiasm stems from theoretical expectations that measures of implicit personality can add to the prediction of job performance provided by traditional, self-report personality measures as well as the belief that they are more resistant to faking. While there have been several attempts to develop measures of implicit personality, few have demonstrated incremental prediction in the criterion space and provided evidence that these measures are truly implicit. This document describes the development and validation of a new conscientiousness measure -- the Anchored Preferential Personality Measure (APPM) -- which is specifically designed to harness implicit biases and mitigate response distortions. Each APPM item presents two equally desirable statements that anchor the low and high ends of a six-point response option scale. This format is expected to create greater ambiguity when determining the most desirable response, leading examinees to respond on the basis of self-referent cognitive biases that occur largely at an unconscious level. The APPM was validated on a sample of 212 college students in honest and faking conditions. Results showed that the APPM was resistant to faking, significantly correlated with the NEO-IPIP composite measure of conscientiousness, and provided incrementally to the prediction of first-year grade point average (GPA). Evidence that the APPM captures implicit elements of personality was provided in accordance with a double dissociation model (Asendorpf, Banse, & Mucke, 2002), with explicit (self-report) measures adding incrementally to the APPM in the prediction of a more deliberate criteria, and the APPM adding incrementally to the prediction over the explicit personality measure for the spontaneous criteria. The implications and future direction for this research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781321302646Subjects--Topical Terms:

520063
Psychology, Industrial.

Examination of the "Implicitness" of the Anchored Measure of Conscientiousness.
LDR:02995nmm a2200313 4500 001 2057410
005 20150610074915.5
008 170521s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321302646
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3643001
035 $a AAI3643001
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shaw, Megan N. $3 3171250
245 1 0 $a Examination of the "Implicitness" of the Anchored Measure of Conscientiousness.
300 $a 145 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-03(E), Section: B.
500 $a Advisers: Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos; David P. Costanza.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The George Washington University, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Over the past two decades, there has been a growing interest in using measures of implicit personality for selection purposes. The enthusiasm stems from theoretical expectations that measures of implicit personality can add to the prediction of job performance provided by traditional, self-report personality measures as well as the belief that they are more resistant to faking. While there have been several attempts to develop measures of implicit personality, few have demonstrated incremental prediction in the criterion space and provided evidence that these measures are truly implicit. This document describes the development and validation of a new conscientiousness measure -- the Anchored Preferential Personality Measure (APPM) -- which is specifically designed to harness implicit biases and mitigate response distortions. Each APPM item presents two equally desirable statements that anchor the low and high ends of a six-point response option scale. This format is expected to create greater ambiguity when determining the most desirable response, leading examinees to respond on the basis of self-referent cognitive biases that occur largely at an unconscious level. The APPM was validated on a sample of 212 college students in honest and faking conditions. Results showed that the APPM was resistant to faking, significantly correlated with the NEO-IPIP composite measure of conscientiousness, and provided incrementally to the prediction of first-year grade point average (GPA). Evidence that the APPM captures implicit elements of personality was provided in accordance with a double dissociation model (Asendorpf, Banse, & Mucke, 2002), with explicit (self-report) measures adding incrementally to the APPM in the prediction of a more deliberate criteria, and the APPM adding incrementally to the prediction over the explicit personality measure for the spontaneous criteria. The implications and future direction for this research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a Psychology, Social. $3 529430
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Organizational Sciences and Communication (I/O Psyc). $3 1669201
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-03B(E).
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3643001