東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An analysis of presidential campaign...

Mansharamani, Neil Hiro.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An analysis of presidential campaigns of sitting and former vice presidents: So close and yet so far.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An analysis of presidential campaigns of sitting and former vice presidents: So close and yet so far./
作者:	Mansharamani, Neil Hiro.
面頁冊數:	311 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International76-04A(E).
標題:	Speech Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3666462
ISBN:	9781321394917

An analysis of presidential campaigns of sitting and former vice presidents: So close and yet so far.
Mansharamani, Neil Hiro.

An analysis of presidential campaigns of sitting and former vice presidents: So close and yet so far. - 311 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study examines the presidential campaign communication of American sitting and former vice presidents. In recent history, four sitting U.S. vice presidents have run for president with only one (George H. W. Bush) succeeding. Three, Richard Nixon in 1960, Hubert Humphrey in 1968, and Albert Gore in 2000, lost close elections, with Nixon and Gore losing in very close and controversial contests. In the two cases of former vice presidents who ran for president, Nixon prevailed in 1968, whereas Walter Mondale failed in 1984. All of these candidates faced similar rhetorical problems attributable to their vice presidential status, particularly in defining their relationship with the president and their role in the administration. This study is a content analysis and historical analysis of campaign speeches, statements made during debates, and television advertisements by sitting and former vice presidents in the elections of 1960, 1968, 1984, 1988, and 2000. The purpose is to understand each vice president's discourse regarding both the president and the administration in which he served; and better appreciate how the inherent rhetorical situation that accompanies a superior-subordinate relationship is illustrated in these types of campaigns. Results showed that some vice presidents (e.g. Richard Nixon) chose to discuss their president/administration more often, while others chose to almost never discuss their president/administration (e.g. Al Gore). This analysis shows that when a vice president seeks election to the presidency, he has tended to pursue one or more of the following strategies: run on the administration's record; minimize the record and argue that if elected, he will produce better results; emphasize their own personal involvement and achievements in the administration; or mostly avoid discussing the president/administration.

ISBN: 9781321394917Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017408
Speech Communication.

An analysis of presidential campaigns of sitting and former vice presidents: So close and yet so far.
LDR:02896nmm a2200301 4500 001 2056898
005 20150608133943.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321394917
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3666462
035 $a AAI3666462
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mansharamani, Neil Hiro. $3 3170685
245 1 3 $a An analysis of presidential campaigns of sitting and former vice presidents: So close and yet so far.
300 $a 311 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Kathleen E. Kendall; James F. Klumpp.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study examines the presidential campaign communication of American sitting and former vice presidents. In recent history, four sitting U.S. vice presidents have run for president with only one (George H. W. Bush) succeeding. Three, Richard Nixon in 1960, Hubert Humphrey in 1968, and Albert Gore in 2000, lost close elections, with Nixon and Gore losing in very close and controversial contests. In the two cases of former vice presidents who ran for president, Nixon prevailed in 1968, whereas Walter Mondale failed in 1984. All of these candidates faced similar rhetorical problems attributable to their vice presidential status, particularly in defining their relationship with the president and their role in the administration. This study is a content analysis and historical analysis of campaign speeches, statements made during debates, and television advertisements by sitting and former vice presidents in the elections of 1960, 1968, 1984, 1988, and 2000. The purpose is to understand each vice president's discourse regarding both the president and the administration in which he served; and better appreciate how the inherent rhetorical situation that accompanies a superior-subordinate relationship is illustrated in these types of campaigns. Results showed that some vice presidents (e.g. Richard Nixon) chose to discuss their president/administration more often, while others chose to almost never discuss their president/administration (e.g. Al Gore). This analysis shows that when a vice president seeks election to the presidency, he has tended to pursue one or more of the following strategies: run on the administration's record; minimize the record and argue that if elected, he will produce better results; emphasize their own personal involvement and achievements in the administration; or mostly avoid discussing the president/administration.
590 $a School code: 0117.
650 4 $a Speech Communication. $3 1017408
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a History, Modern. $3 516334
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0582
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Communication. $3 1272679
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 76-04A(E).
790 $a 0117
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3666462