語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Putting out fires: How communication...
~
Allen, Susan D.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Putting out fires: How communication professionals understand and practice conflict resolution.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Putting out fires: How communication professionals understand and practice conflict resolution./
作者:
Allen, Susan D.
面頁冊數:
341 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International76-04A(E).
標題:
Speech Communication. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3666452
ISBN:
9781321394788
Putting out fires: How communication professionals understand and practice conflict resolution.
Allen, Susan D.
Putting out fires: How communication professionals understand and practice conflict resolution.
- 341 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Do communication professionals fill the role of negotiators and conflict resolvers within their organizations? Some scholars (Dozier, Grunig, & Grunig, 1995; Plowman, 2007) have claimed this role theoretically, but little research evidence has verified the negotiator role in practice. To gather empirical evidence, I conducted a qualitative research study (Corbin & Strauss, 2008; Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2014) using in-depth interviews and critical incident technique with thirty-one public relations professionals who had an average of 18 years of experience in a variety of organizations across the United States and overseas. Data analysis included open and axial coding and integration with prior research. Validity and reliability were enhanced through member checking, triangulation of data, and peer review of findings. Researcher bias was minimized through bracketing and audit trails. Findings showed that practitioners experienced most conflict within teams and other internal audiences, practiced conflict avoidance rather than conflict engagement, understood individual level factors as major contributors to conflict, and avoided digital channels in conflict resolution. A model of practitioners as transformers of organizational conflict is proposed. This exploratory study leaves an important question unanswered: Can communication practitioners play a recognized role in transforming organizational conflicts rather than negotiating solutions? A quantitative survey with random sampling could be a next step in verifying the extent of conflict resolution in communication practice and how practitioners can engage workplace conflict more effectively. However, communication practitioners in my sample strongly recommended conflict training and activism to promote conflict transformation as an official role for public relations professionals.
ISBN: 9781321394788Subjects--Topical Terms:
1017408
Speech Communication.
Putting out fires: How communication professionals understand and practice conflict resolution.
LDR
:03043nmm a2200313 4500
001
2056896
005
20150608133943.5
008
170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781321394788
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3666452
035
$a
AAI3666452
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Allen, Susan D.
$3
3170683
245
1 0
$a
Putting out fires: How communication professionals understand and practice conflict resolution.
300
$a
341 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 76-04(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Elizabeth L. Toth.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2014.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Do communication professionals fill the role of negotiators and conflict resolvers within their organizations? Some scholars (Dozier, Grunig, & Grunig, 1995; Plowman, 2007) have claimed this role theoretically, but little research evidence has verified the negotiator role in practice. To gather empirical evidence, I conducted a qualitative research study (Corbin & Strauss, 2008; Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2014) using in-depth interviews and critical incident technique with thirty-one public relations professionals who had an average of 18 years of experience in a variety of organizations across the United States and overseas. Data analysis included open and axial coding and integration with prior research. Validity and reliability were enhanced through member checking, triangulation of data, and peer review of findings. Researcher bias was minimized through bracketing and audit trails. Findings showed that practitioners experienced most conflict within teams and other internal audiences, practiced conflict avoidance rather than conflict engagement, understood individual level factors as major contributors to conflict, and avoided digital channels in conflict resolution. A model of practitioners as transformers of organizational conflict is proposed. This exploratory study leaves an important question unanswered: Can communication practitioners play a recognized role in transforming organizational conflicts rather than negotiating solutions? A quantitative survey with random sampling could be a next step in verifying the extent of conflict resolution in communication practice and how practitioners can engage workplace conflict more effectively. However, communication practitioners in my sample strongly recommended conflict training and activism to promote conflict transformation as an official role for public relations professionals.
520
$a
Keywords: negotiation, public relations, communication professionals, conflict management, conflict transformation, grounded theory, digital conflict resolution.
590
$a
School code: 0117.
650
4
$a
Speech Communication.
$3
1017408
650
4
$a
Sociology, Organizational.
$3
1018023
650
4
$a
Business Administration, Management.
$3
626628
690
$a
0459
690
$a
0703
690
$a
0454
710
2
$a
University of Maryland, College Park.
$b
Communication.
$3
1272679
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
76-04A(E).
790
$a
0117
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2014
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3666452
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9289400
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入