東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Law enforcement response to intellec...

Shaw, Cynthia Ann.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Law enforcement response to intellectual property crime: Has the PRO-IP Act made a difference?

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Law enforcement response to intellectual property crime: Has the PRO-IP Act made a difference?/
Author:	Shaw, Cynthia Ann.
Description:	54 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International53-06(E).
Subject:	Intellectual Property. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1564627
ISBN:	9781321176780

Law enforcement response to intellectual property crime: Has the PRO-IP Act made a difference?
Shaw, Cynthia Ann.

Law enforcement response to intellectual property crime: Has the PRO-IP Act made a difference? - 54 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-06.

Thesis (M.S.)--Utica College, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This capstone project specifically addresses the federal, state, and local law enforcement response to criminal intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement, especially after the enactment of the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO-IP) Act of 2008. To foster greater understanding of the topic, the paper offers a broad perspective of IPR, including the definition of IPR, the legal protections afforded IPR in the US; arguments both for and against enforcing IPR, and strategies employed to reduce IPR infringement. These mitigation strategies included developing international agreements to prevent infringement, public education, and enhanced enforcement of criminal statutes. Even though there is no reliable method to accurately calculate the total amount of IPR-infringing goods in circulation, making the determination of success of PRO-IP difficult, the study revealed that the PRO-IP resulted in increased investigation and prosecution of IPR infringement by federal law enforcement (LE) and selected state and local authorities. Because this paper determined that there is no comprehensive reporting mechanism for IPR enforcement by state and local LE, resulting in limited information from this arena, a recommendation was made to change the FBI National Incident Based Reporting (NIBRS) guidelines to include IP crimes. Additionally, a recommendation was made to standardize the reporting of IP arrests and seizures by federal agencies to provide accurate statistical analysis. Keywords: Economic Crime Management, Dr. Shannon Johnson, counterfeit goods, IPEP, IPEC, IPR Coordination Center, DOJ-BJA.

ISBN: 9781321176780Subjects--Topical Terms:

782112
Intellectual Property.

Law enforcement response to intellectual property crime: Has the PRO-IP Act made a difference?
LDR:02634nmm a2200289 4500 001 2056351
005 20150526083637.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321176780
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1564627
035 $a AAI1564627
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shaw, Cynthia Ann. $3 3170102
245 1 0 $a Law enforcement response to intellectual property crime: Has the PRO-IP Act made a difference?
300 $a 54 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-06.
500 $a Adviser: Shannon L. Johnson.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Utica College, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This capstone project specifically addresses the federal, state, and local law enforcement response to criminal intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement, especially after the enactment of the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property (PRO-IP) Act of 2008. To foster greater understanding of the topic, the paper offers a broad perspective of IPR, including the definition of IPR, the legal protections afforded IPR in the US; arguments both for and against enforcing IPR, and strategies employed to reduce IPR infringement. These mitigation strategies included developing international agreements to prevent infringement, public education, and enhanced enforcement of criminal statutes. Even though there is no reliable method to accurately calculate the total amount of IPR-infringing goods in circulation, making the determination of success of PRO-IP difficult, the study revealed that the PRO-IP resulted in increased investigation and prosecution of IPR infringement by federal law enforcement (LE) and selected state and local authorities. Because this paper determined that there is no comprehensive reporting mechanism for IPR enforcement by state and local LE, resulting in limited information from this arena, a recommendation was made to change the FBI National Incident Based Reporting (NIBRS) guidelines to include IP crimes. Additionally, a recommendation was made to standardize the reporting of IP arrests and seizures by federal agencies to provide accurate statistical analysis. Keywords: Economic Crime Management, Dr. Shannon Johnson, counterfeit goods, IPEP, IPEC, IPR Coordination Center, DOJ-BJA.
590 $a School code: 1754.
650 4 $a Intellectual Property. $3 782112
690 $a 0513
710 2 $a Utica College. $b Economic Crime Management. $3 2098214
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 53-06(E).
790 $a 1754
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1564627