東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sophistic epistemology.

Hanson, Hans-Peder B.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sophistic epistemology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sophistic epistemology./
作者:	Hanson, Hans-Peder B.
面頁冊數:	436 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: A, page: 6400.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-02A.
標題:	Classical Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3394253
ISBN:	9781109609363

Sophistic epistemology.
Hanson, Hans-Peder B.

Sophistic epistemology. - 436 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: A, page: 6400.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2009.

The sophists' well-established professional activities are incompatible with epistemological relativism. One cannot justifiably teach or persuade others to adopt certain viewpoints if one believes that all viewpoints are equally valid. Pragmatism, intellectual dishonesty, belief in objective principles, or disinterest in persuasion are unsatisfactory explanations for this discrepancy. While each has its own weaknesses, all fail to explain Plato's sustained and often respectful treatment of Protagoras and Gorgias as both rhetoricians and serious, relativistic thinkers. In this dissertation, I shall show that major sophistic figures of the fifth century reject epistemological relativism. I shall argue that Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon, and Thucydides instead hold constructivist epistemologies. However, they differ on how much power humans have to shape, alter, and control knowledge. The more pessimistic views of Antiphon and Thucydides may reflect the influence of the Peloponnesian War and the emergence of harmful demagoguery. Those who would appropriate the sophists' ideas would do well to bear this history in mind.

ISBN: 9781109609363Subjects--Topical Terms:

1005855
Classical Studies.

Sophistic epistemology.
LDR:01981nmm a2200289 4500 001 2056314
005 20150609093925.5
008 170521s2009 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109609363
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3394253
035 $a AAI3394253
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hanson, Hans-Peder B. $3 3170061
245 1 0 $a Sophistic epistemology.
300 $a 436 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-02, Section: A, page: 6400.
500 $a Adviser: Ruby Blondell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2009.
520 $a The sophists' well-established professional activities are incompatible with epistemological relativism. One cannot justifiably teach or persuade others to adopt certain viewpoints if one believes that all viewpoints are equally valid. Pragmatism, intellectual dishonesty, belief in objective principles, or disinterest in persuasion are unsatisfactory explanations for this discrepancy. While each has its own weaknesses, all fail to explain Plato's sustained and often respectful treatment of Protagoras and Gorgias as both rhetoricians and serious, relativistic thinkers. In this dissertation, I shall show that major sophistic figures of the fifth century reject epistemological relativism. I shall argue that Protagoras, Gorgias, Antiphon, and Thucydides instead hold constructivist epistemologies. However, they differ on how much power humans have to shape, alter, and control knowledge. The more pessimistic views of Antiphon and Thucydides may reflect the influence of the Peloponnesian War and the emergence of harmful demagoguery. Those who would appropriate the sophists' ideas would do well to bear this history in mind.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Classical Studies. $3 1005855
650 4 $a Literature, Classical. $3 1017779
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
690 $a 0434
690 $a 0294
690 $a 0393
710 2 $a University of Washington. $3 545923
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-02A.
790 $a 0250
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2009
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3394253