東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Comparison of Linguistic Features ...

Russell, Margo K.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison of Linguistic Features in the Academic Writing of Advanced English Language Learner and English First Language University Students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparison of Linguistic Features in the Academic Writing of Advanced English Language Learner and English First Language University Students./
作者:	Russell, Margo K.
面頁冊數:	98 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International53-03(E).
標題:	Education, English as a Second Language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1561157
ISBN:	9781321058833

A Comparison of Linguistic Features in the Academic Writing of Advanced English Language Learner and English First Language University Students.
Russell, Margo K.

A Comparison of Linguistic Features in the Academic Writing of Advanced English Language Learner and English First Language University Students. - 98 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--Portland State University, 2014.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Writing for an academic purpose is not an easy skill to master, whether for a native English speaker (L1) or an English language learner (ELL). In order to better prepare ELL students for success in mainstream content courses at the university level, more must be known about the characteristics of student writing in the local context of an intensive English program. This information can be used to inform ELL writing instructors of which linguistic features to target so that their students produce writing that sounds appropriate for the academic written register.

ISBN: 9781321058833Subjects--Topical Terms:

1030294
Education, English as a Second Language.

A Comparison of Linguistic Features in the Academic Writing of Advanced English Language Learner and English First Language University Students.
LDR:03685nmm a2200349 4500 001 2056051
005 20150429102519.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321058833
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1561157
035 $a AAI1561157
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Russell, Margo K. $3 3169776
245 1 2 $a A Comparison of Linguistic Features in the Academic Writing of Advanced English Language Learner and English First Language University Students.
300 $a 98 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 53-03.
500 $a Adviser: Susan Conrad.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Portland State University, 2014.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Writing for an academic purpose is not an easy skill to master, whether for a native English speaker (L1) or an English language learner (ELL). In order to better prepare ELL students for success in mainstream content courses at the university level, more must be known about the characteristics of student writing in the local context of an intensive English program. This information can be used to inform ELL writing instructors of which linguistic features to target so that their students produce writing that sounds appropriate for the academic written register.
520 $a Two corpora of 30 research essays each were compiled, one of L1 student writing done in various departments at Portland State University, and the other of ELL writing produced in an advanced writing course in Portland State University's Intensive English Language Program. The corpora were compared for the frequencies of 13 linguistic features which had been previously found in significantly different frequencies in L1 and ELL essays (Hinkel, 2002).
520 $a The tokens of each feature in each essay were counted, and the frequency rate was calculated in each case. The results of the Mann-Whitney U test found 6 features with significantly different frequency rates between the two corpora. The following features were more frequent in L1 essays than in ELL essays: modal would, perfect aspect, passive voice, reduced adjective clause, and it-cleft. In addition, the type/token ratio was found be significantly higher in L1 essays than in ELL essays.
520 $a An analysis of how each of the significant features was used in the context of ELL and L1 essays revealed the following: Both student groups were still acquiring the appropriate use of modal would; the majority of students in both groups did not utilize it-clefts; the lower type/token ratio in ELL essays meant that these students used a more limited vocabulary than did L1 students; and ELL students were still acquiring the accurate and appropriate uses of perfect aspect, passive voice, and reduced adjective clauses, whereas L1 students used these features grammatically and for the standard uses.
520 $a To apply these findings to the ELL writing classroom, instructors should help students raise their awareness of these six features in their own academic writing by leading students in identifying grammatical and ungrammatical uses of these features and providing practice in differentiating between uses which are standard to the register of academic writing and uses which are appropriate only in conversation. Two sample activities are included to illustrate how to implement these recommendations.
590 $a School code: 0180.
650 4 $a Education, English as a Second Language. $3 1030294
650 4 $a Language, Linguistics. $3 1018079
650 4 $a Language, General. $3 1018089
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a Portland State University. $b Applied Linguistics (TESOL). $3 1678783
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 53-03(E).
790 $a 0180
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1561157