語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Civility, anonymity and the breakdow...
~
Santana, Arthur D.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere./
作者:
Santana, Arthur D.
面頁冊數:
162 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International74-01A(E).
標題:
Journalism. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3523471
ISBN:
9781267564634
Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere.
Santana, Arthur D.
Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere.
- 162 p.
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2012.
Reader comment forums of online newspapers, a relatively new feature of online journalism, have been called spaces of public deliberation. At their inception among large newspapers just five years ago, the forums were heralded as a new way for the public to advance public dialogue by sharing opinions in an unconstrained way, promoting the democratic principles of the newspaper institution itself. Rampant incivility, however, has since become one the forums' chief defining characteristics. By content analyzing comments from online newspapers that allow anonymity, this research confirms anecdotal evidence from journalists that Latinos are regularly debased in the forums by commenters following news on immigration. This study also compares the civility of anonymous comments following news on the Tea Party movement, a non-racialized but also controversial topic. Finally, civility is measured in the comments following news on immigration from online newspapers that have disallowed anonymity. In all, more than 22,000 comments from nearly 200 news stories in more than a dozen online newspapers were collected between 2010 and 2012, and a sample of 1,350 was coded. The analysis shows that online newspaper discussion boards that allow anonymity and that follow news about immigration predominantly contain comments by those who support tough immigration laws and who express themselves with emotionally laden, uncivil comments directed at Latinos. Similar discussion boards that disallow anonymity predominantly contain comments by those who support tough immigration laws and who express themselves with emotionally laden yet civil comments directed at Latinos. Overall, this research demonstrates that a racialized topic is apt to draw more uncivil anonymous comments than a non-racialized one and that removing anonymity elevates the level of dialogue. Building on the theories of the public sphere, reduced cues in anonymity and critical race theory, this paper demonstrates that in their new role in creating a new public square of open discussion, newspapers are sometimes creating forums for hate speech while also publishing content that is perpetuating negative portrayals of Latinos. Findings reveal that a new public sphere created by online newspapers, meant to promote democracy, is actually having the opposite effect for some minority groups.
ISBN: 9781267564634Subjects--Topical Terms:
576107
Journalism.
Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere.
LDR
:03240nmm a2200289 4500
001
2055881
005
20150319081951.5
008
170521s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781267564634
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI3523471
035
$a
AAI3523471
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Santana, Arthur D.
$3
3169586
245
1 0
$a
Civility, anonymity and the breakdown of a new public sphere.
300
$a
162 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-01(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: John Russial.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2012.
520
$a
Reader comment forums of online newspapers, a relatively new feature of online journalism, have been called spaces of public deliberation. At their inception among large newspapers just five years ago, the forums were heralded as a new way for the public to advance public dialogue by sharing opinions in an unconstrained way, promoting the democratic principles of the newspaper institution itself. Rampant incivility, however, has since become one the forums' chief defining characteristics. By content analyzing comments from online newspapers that allow anonymity, this research confirms anecdotal evidence from journalists that Latinos are regularly debased in the forums by commenters following news on immigration. This study also compares the civility of anonymous comments following news on the Tea Party movement, a non-racialized but also controversial topic. Finally, civility is measured in the comments following news on immigration from online newspapers that have disallowed anonymity. In all, more than 22,000 comments from nearly 200 news stories in more than a dozen online newspapers were collected between 2010 and 2012, and a sample of 1,350 was coded. The analysis shows that online newspaper discussion boards that allow anonymity and that follow news about immigration predominantly contain comments by those who support tough immigration laws and who express themselves with emotionally laden, uncivil comments directed at Latinos. Similar discussion boards that disallow anonymity predominantly contain comments by those who support tough immigration laws and who express themselves with emotionally laden yet civil comments directed at Latinos. Overall, this research demonstrates that a racialized topic is apt to draw more uncivil anonymous comments than a non-racialized one and that removing anonymity elevates the level of dialogue. Building on the theories of the public sphere, reduced cues in anonymity and critical race theory, this paper demonstrates that in their new role in creating a new public square of open discussion, newspapers are sometimes creating forums for hate speech while also publishing content that is perpetuating negative portrayals of Latinos. Findings reveal that a new public sphere created by online newspapers, meant to promote democracy, is actually having the opposite effect for some minority groups.
590
$a
School code: 0171.
650
4
$a
Journalism.
$3
576107
650
4
$a
Mass Communications.
$3
1017395
650
4
$a
Web Studies.
$3
1026830
690
$a
0391
690
$a
0708
690
$a
0646
710
2
$a
University of Oregon.
$b
School of Journalism and Communication.
$3
2099539
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
74-01A(E).
790
$a
0171
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2012
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3523471
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9288360
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入