東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Diverse evidence, independent eviden...

Helgeson, Casey.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Diverse evidence, independent evidence, and Darwin's arguments from anatomy and biogeography.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Diverse evidence, independent evidence, and Darwin's arguments from anatomy and biogeography./
作者:	Helgeson, Casey.
面頁冊數:	146 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-08A(E).
標題:	Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3558320
ISBN:	9781303027215

Diverse evidence, independent evidence, and Darwin's arguments from anatomy and biogeography.
Helgeson, Casey.

Diverse evidence, independent evidence, and Darwin's arguments from anatomy and biogeography. - 146 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2013.

In science, as in everyday life, multiple pieces of evidence that are diverse in character, or that arrive from different quarters, sometimes work together, pointing to the same conclusion. We tend to find this particularly convincing. But is our intuitive reaction correct? Does a notion of kinds of evidence, or of diversity in the character of the evidence, really have a place in rational inductive inference, or is it only, so to speak, the total quantity of evidence that matters? One label for the phenomenon of multiple sources of evidence working together for greater effect is "consilience". In this dissertation, I investigate the epistemology of consilience from two directions: first, by reconstructing the reasoning involved in an important scientific argument from Darwin's Origin that ostensibly appeals to consilience, and second, by attempting to formally model the epistemological value of consilience in probabilistic terms.

ISBN: 9781303027215Subjects--Topical Terms:

516511
Philosophy.

Diverse evidence, independent evidence, and Darwin's arguments from anatomy and biogeography.
LDR:01867nmm a2200289 4500 001 2055535
005 20150121073627.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303027215
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3558320
035 $a AAI3558320
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Helgeson, Casey. $3 3169207
245 1 0 $a Diverse evidence, independent evidence, and Darwin's arguments from anatomy and biogeography.
300 $a 146 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Elliott Sober.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2013.
520 $a In science, as in everyday life, multiple pieces of evidence that are diverse in character, or that arrive from different quarters, sometimes work together, pointing to the same conclusion. We tend to find this particularly convincing. But is our intuitive reaction correct? Does a notion of kinds of evidence, or of diversity in the character of the evidence, really have a place in rational inductive inference, or is it only, so to speak, the total quantity of evidence that matters? One label for the phenomenon of multiple sources of evidence working together for greater effect is "consilience". In this dissertation, I investigate the epistemology of consilience from two directions: first, by reconstructing the reasoning involved in an important scientific argument from Darwin's Origin that ostensibly appeals to consilience, and second, by attempting to formally model the epistemological value of consilience in probabilistic terms.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 894954
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0402
690 $a 0393
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Philosophy. $3 2091967
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-08A(E).
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3558320