東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The role of emotional intelligence a...

Simonet, Daniel V.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The role of emotional intelligence and state affect in competitive versus cooperative dyadic negotiations.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The role of emotional intelligence and state affect in competitive versus cooperative dyadic negotiations./
作者:	Simonet, Daniel V.
面頁冊數:	228 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-09B(E).
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3622722
ISBN:	9781303946295

The role of emotional intelligence and state affect in competitive versus cooperative dyadic negotiations.
Simonet, Daniel V.

The role of emotional intelligence and state affect in competitive versus cooperative dyadic negotiations. - 228 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tulsa, 2014.

Affect, emotional intelligence (EI), and team interactions are highly interrelated themes; all pertain to the patterning and adaptation of social behavior under emotionally eliciting conditions. Yet, research streams on these three topics rarely come together. Rather, most studies examine either the predictive utility of EI, the nature of emotions in organizational life, or the role of affective processes within teams. As a complement to the current literature, the study examines the relationship between EI and both subjective and objective negotiation outcomes. Drawing upon theories of social interdependence and trait activation theory, a model specifying how emotional self-regulation and perception at the individual-level interacts with the negotiation situation to influence outcomes via affective processes is developed and tested. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned to either a cooperative and conflicted same-sex negotiation session. To promote targeted effects, three "active ingredients" salient to competition were manipulated simultaneously: (1) payoff structure (i.e., integrative vs. distributive), (2) reward structure (e.g., interdependent vs. independent), and (3) social motive (i.e., cooperative vs. competitive). As hypothesized, moderated mediated effects were found for emotional regulation in predicting self-satisfaction via state negative affect in competitive contexts only. The effects of emotional facial perception via state positive affect, however, were opposite the hypothesized direction for predicting both process and relationship satisfaction in cooperative contexts only. In contrast to subjective outcomes, the two EI by negotiation interactions did not predict economic gains. The emotional perception interaction held after accounting for agreeableness whereas the emotional regulation interaction fell to non-significance after accounting for neuroticism and cognitive ability. Implications and future directions for creating a situated understanding of EI and emotions in negotiations are discussed.

ISBN: 9781303946295Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

The role of emotional intelligence and state affect in competitive versus cooperative dyadic negotiations.
LDR:03006nmm a2200301 4500 001 2055354
005 20141203121522.5
008 170521s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303946295
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3622722
035 $a AAI3622722
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Simonet, Daniel V. $3 3169003
245 1 4 $a The role of emotional intelligence and state affect in competitive versus cooperative dyadic negotiations.
300 $a 228 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Robert Tett.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Tulsa, 2014.
520 $a Affect, emotional intelligence (EI), and team interactions are highly interrelated themes; all pertain to the patterning and adaptation of social behavior under emotionally eliciting conditions. Yet, research streams on these three topics rarely come together. Rather, most studies examine either the predictive utility of EI, the nature of emotions in organizational life, or the role of affective processes within teams. As a complement to the current literature, the study examines the relationship between EI and both subjective and objective negotiation outcomes. Drawing upon theories of social interdependence and trait activation theory, a model specifying how emotional self-regulation and perception at the individual-level interacts with the negotiation situation to influence outcomes via affective processes is developed and tested. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned to either a cooperative and conflicted same-sex negotiation session. To promote targeted effects, three "active ingredients" salient to competition were manipulated simultaneously: (1) payoff structure (i.e., integrative vs. distributive), (2) reward structure (e.g., interdependent vs. independent), and (3) social motive (i.e., cooperative vs. competitive). As hypothesized, moderated mediated effects were found for emotional regulation in predicting self-satisfaction via state negative affect in competitive contexts only. The effects of emotional facial perception via state positive affect, however, were opposite the hypothesized direction for predicting both process and relationship satisfaction in cooperative contexts only. In contrast to subjective outcomes, the two EI by negotiation interactions did not predict economic gains. The emotional perception interaction held after accounting for agreeableness whereas the emotional regulation interaction fell to non-significance after accounting for neuroticism and cognitive ability. Implications and future directions for creating a situated understanding of EI and emotions in negotiations are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0236.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Sociology, Organizational. $3 1018023
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral Sciences. $3 1669657
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0602
710 2 $a The University of Tulsa. $b Industrial/Organizational Psychology. $3 3169004
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-09B(E).
790 $a 0236
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3622722