東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effect of Lying on Self-Control ...

D'Agata, Madeleine T.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Lying on Self-Control Depletion.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effect of Lying on Self-Control Depletion./
作者:	D'Agata, Madeleine T.
面頁冊數:	0 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International52-05(E).
標題:	Psychology, Cognitive. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MS25419
ISBN:	9780499254191

The Effect of Lying on Self-Control Depletion.
D'Agata, Madeleine T.

The Effect of Lying on Self-Control Depletion. - 0 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2013.

The goal of the current research was to investigate the impact of lying on self-control depletion. I hypothesised that lying would require more self-control than would truth telling. In Study 1, participants were assigned one of two topics, a favourite movie or a personal problem, about which they lied or told the truth in counterbalanced order on camera for two minutes. Following the first video in which they either told the truth or lied, participants completed an anagram task that served as the measure of self-control depletion. I found that participants in the movie condition did not differ as a function of lying or telling the truth although the means were in the expected direction. Also, contrary to my predictions, participants who lied about a personal problem were significantly less depleted than were participants who told the truth about their personal problem. In Study 2, participants were assigned to either deny or confess possession of an object in two interviews, but they actually possessed the object in only one interview creating the lie versus truth-telling manipulations. After both interviews, participants' reaction times were recorded for the Stroop task, which served as the measure of ego- depletion. I did not find a significant difference between participants who lied first versus participants who told the truth first. Furthermore, participants assigned to deny versus confess to possessing the object did not differ on the Stroop task reaction times. Possible explanations for why the results did not support the hypothesis that lying is ego- depleting are discussed.

ISBN: 9780499254191Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017810
Psychology, Cognitive.

The Effect of Lying on Self-Control Depletion.
LDR:02408nmm a2200277 4500 001 2055240
005 20141112080407.5
008 170521s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780499254191
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAIMS25419
035 $a AAIMS25419
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a D'Agata, Madeleine T. $3 3168877
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Lying on Self-Control Depletion.
300 $a 0 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 52-05.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.)--Queen's University (Canada), 2013.
520 $a The goal of the current research was to investigate the impact of lying on self-control depletion. I hypothesised that lying would require more self-control than would truth telling. In Study 1, participants were assigned one of two topics, a favourite movie or a personal problem, about which they lied or told the truth in counterbalanced order on camera for two minutes. Following the first video in which they either told the truth or lied, participants completed an anagram task that served as the measure of self-control depletion. I found that participants in the movie condition did not differ as a function of lying or telling the truth although the means were in the expected direction. Also, contrary to my predictions, participants who lied about a personal problem were significantly less depleted than were participants who told the truth about their personal problem. In Study 2, participants were assigned to either deny or confess possession of an object in two interviews, but they actually possessed the object in only one interview creating the lie versus truth-telling manipulations. After both interviews, participants' reaction times were recorded for the Stroop task, which served as the measure of ego- depletion. I did not find a significant difference between participants who lied first versus participants who told the truth first. Furthermore, participants assigned to deny versus confess to possessing the object did not differ on the Stroop task reaction times. Possible explanations for why the results did not support the hypothesis that lying is ego- depleting are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0283.
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Psychology, Personality. $3 1017585
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a Queen's University (Canada). $b Psychology. $3 1033847
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 52-05(E).
790 $a 0283
791 $a M.Sc.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MS25419