東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Sovereignty for Survival: American E...

Allison, James Robert, Ill.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination./
作者:	Allison, James Robert, Ill.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2013,
面頁冊數:	269 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-12A(E).
標題:	American history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3573526
ISBN:	9781303439704

Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination.
Allison, James Robert, Ill.

Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2013 - 269 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

This dissertation explains how American Indians reclaimed control over their natural resources. During the 1970s "Energy Crises," tribes possessing minerals crucial to America's quest for energy independence resisted large-scale, federally-supported mining projects that threatened the survival of their indigenous communities. Out of this local resistance, tribal leaders recognized the need for a nationally coordinated movement to provide their governments with the institutional capacity to responsibly manage reservation land. To do so, they forged innovative partnerships with federal agencies tasked with increasing domestic energy production, creating the Council of Energy Resource Tribes that promised energy for the nation and desperately needed revenue for the tribes.

ISBN: 9781303439704Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122692
American history.

Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination.
LDR:03290nmm a2200349 4500 001 2054860
005 20170424144343.5
008 170519s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303439704
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3573526
035 $a AAI3573526
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Allison, James Robert, Ill. $3 3168438
245 1 0 $a Sovereignty for Survival: American Energy Development and Indian Self-Determination.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2013
300 $a 269 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Edmund Russell.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Virginia, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
520 $a This dissertation explains how American Indians reclaimed control over their natural resources. During the 1970s "Energy Crises," tribes possessing minerals crucial to America's quest for energy independence resisted large-scale, federally-supported mining projects that threatened the survival of their indigenous communities. Out of this local resistance, tribal leaders recognized the need for a nationally coordinated movement to provide their governments with the institutional capacity to responsibly manage reservation land. To do so, they forged innovative partnerships with federal agencies tasked with increasing domestic energy production, creating the Council of Energy Resource Tribes that promised energy for the nation and desperately needed revenue for the tribes.
520 $a Unfortunately, antiquated federal laws hindered energy tribes' efforts to develop reservation resources. Passed during the Progressive Era and embedded with notions of Indian inferiority, these laws placed federal "experts" in position to direct reservation mining, denying tribes the right to shape the pace and scale of development. Tribal leaders, however, had just spent the previous decade expanding their institutional capacities, and they now demanded the authority to exercise their newly acquired capabilities. Working with industry representatives, federal officials, and members of Congress, energy tribes thus constructed a new legal regime -- anchored by the 1982 Indian Mineral Development Act -- that recognized tribal, not federal, control over reservation development.
520 $a Importantly, these momentous efforts to restructure federal law also reshaped Indian Country. As tribes altered their governments to better manage resources, intense internal debates erupted over culturally authentic forms of indigenous governance. The resolution of these conflicts often established new tribal governing structures, but left reservation communities deeply divided over whether these new forms adequately represented their shared values. In the end, the process to increase tribal capacity and secure legal authority over reservation resources produced both a new federal regulatory regime and new tribal governing structures and values.
590 $a School code: 0246.
650 4 $a American history. $3 2122692
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 2122730
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0740
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0439
710 2 $a University of Virginia. $3 645578
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-12A(E).
790 $a 0246
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3573526