東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and...

Bertolaso, Marta.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and relational view /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Philosophy of cancer/ by Marta Bertolaso.
其他題名:	a dynamic and relational view /
作者:	Bertolaso, Marta.
出版者:	Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands : : 2016.,
面頁冊數:	xv, 190 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Cancer - Philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2
ISBN:	9789402408652

Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and relational view /
Bertolaso, Marta.

Philosophy of cancera dynamic and relational view /[electronic resource] :by Marta Bertolaso. - Dordrecht :Springer Netherlands :2016. - xv, 190 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences,v.182211-1948 ;. - History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences ;v.4..

1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.

Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.

ISBN: 9789402408652

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

2210643
Cancer
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: RC261

Dewey Class. No.: 616

Philosophy of cancer = a dynamic and relational view /
LDR:03336nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2048230
003 DE-He213
005 20170213141207.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 170319s2016 ne s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789402408652 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789402408638 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-94-024-0865-2
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a RC261
072 7 $a HP $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a SCI086000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 616 $2 23
090 $a RC261 $b .B546 2016
100 1 $a Bertolaso, Marta. $3 2210642
245 1 0 $a Philosophy of cancer $h [electronic resource] : $b a dynamic and relational view / $c by Marta Bertolaso.
260 $a Dordrecht : $b Springer Netherlands : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a xv, 190 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences, $x 2211-1948 ; $v v.18
505 0 $a 1. Cancer Biology -- 2. The Evolution of Explanatory Models of Cancer -- 3. The Systemic Approach to Cancer: Models and Epistemology -- 4. The Tissue Organization Field Theory and an Anti-Reductionist Campaign -- 5. Towards a Relational Ontology for Cancer -- 6. On Biological Explanations -- 7. Complementary Issues of a Relational View of Biological Determination.
520 $a Since the 1970s, the origin of cancer is being explored from the point of view of the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT), focusing on genetic mutations and clonal expansion of somatic cells. As cancer research expanded in several directions, the dominant focus on cells remained steady, but the classes of genes and the kinds of extra-genetic factors that were shown to have causal relevance in the onset of cancer multiplied. The wild heterogeneity of cancer-related mutations and phenotypes, along with the increasing complication of models, led to an oscillation between the hectic search of 'the' few key factors that cause cancer and the discouragement in face of a seeming 'endless complexity'. To tame this complexity, cancer research started to avail itself of the tools that were being developed by Systems Biology. At the same time, anti-reductionist voices began claiming that cancer research was stuck in a sterile research paradigm. This alternative discourse even gave birth to an alternative theory: the Tissue Organization Field Theory (TOFT) A deeper philosophical analysis shows the serious limits of both reductionist and anti-reductionist positions and of their polarization. This book demonstrates that a radical philosophical reflection is necessary to drive cancer research out of its impasses. At the very least, this will be a reflection on the assumptions of different kinds of cancer research, on the implications of what cancer research has been discovering over 40 years and more, on a view of scientific practice that is most able to make sense of the cognitive and social conflicts that are seen in the scientific community (and in its results), and, finally, on the nature of living entities with which we entertain this fascinating epistemological dance that we call scientific research. The proposed Dynamic and Relational View of carcinogenesis is a starting point in all these directions.
650 0 $a Cancer $x Philosophy. $3 2210643
650 0 $a Medicine $x Philosophy. $3 550036
650 0 $a Health $x Philosophy. $3 653363
650 1 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Biology. $3 897034
650 2 4 $a Cancer Research. $3 891172
650 2 4 $a Cell Biology. $3 892383
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Medicine. $3 894449
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a History, philosophy and theory of the life sciences ; $v v.4. $3 2055279
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0865-2
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)