東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Argument types and fallacies in lega...

Bustamante, Thomas.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation/ edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman.
其他作者:	Bustamante, Thomas.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
面頁冊數:	xvi, 222 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	Introduction -- about the authors -- I. Argument Types or Fallacies? -- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony - A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and Lena Wahlberg -- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap -- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso -- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of 'insulting'; Harm Kloosterhuis -- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz -- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation -- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante -- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Michał Araszkiewicz -- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions; Eveline Feteris -- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein's Minimalism, Richard Posner's Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin's Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Goncalves Fernandes -- Index.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Forensic orations. -
電子資源:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8
ISBN:	9783319161488 (electronic bk.)

Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation
Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation[electronic resource] /edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xvi, 222 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Law and philosophy library,v.1121572-4395 ;. - Law and philosophy library ;v.108..

Introduction -- about the authors -- I. Argument Types or Fallacies? -- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony - A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and Lena Wahlberg -- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap -- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso -- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of 'insulting'; Harm Kloosterhuis -- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz -- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation -- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante -- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Michał Araszkiewicz -- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions; Eveline Feteris -- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein's Minimalism, Richard Posner's Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin's Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Goncalves Fernandes -- Index.

This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.

ISBN: 9783319161488 (electronic bk.)

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

887875
Forensic orations.

LC Class. No.: K181

Dewey Class. No.: 347.075

Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation
LDR:03149nmm m2200337 m 4500 001 2001792
003 DE-He213
005 20151127115205.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 151215s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319161488 (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319161471 (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-16148-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a K181
072 7 $a LAB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW079000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PHI021000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 347.075 $2 23
090 $a K181 $b .A694 2015
245 0 0 $a Argument types and fallacies in legal argumentation $h [electronic resource] / $c edited by Thomas Bustamante, Christian Dahlman.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a xvi, 222 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Law and philosophy library, $x 1572-4395 ; $v v.112
505 0 $a Introduction -- about the authors -- I. Argument Types or Fallacies? -- 1. Appeal to Expert Testimony - A Bayesian Approach; Christian Dahlman and Lena Wahlberg -- 2. Ad Hominem Fallacies and Epistemic Credibility; Audrey Yap -- 3. On the Absence of Evidence; Giovanni Tuzet -- 4. The Uses of Slippery Slope Argument; Jose Juan Moreso -- 5. Institutional constraints of topical strategic maneuvering in legal argumentation. The case of 'insulting'; Harm Kloosterhuis -- 6. One-Sided Argumentation in the Defense of Marriage Act; Janice Schuetz -- II. Argument Types and Legal Interpretation -- 7. Anti-Theoretical Claims about Legal Interpretation: The Argument behind the Fallacy; Thomas Bustamante -- 8. Frames of Interpretations and the Container-Retrieval View: Reflections on a Theoretical Contest; Pierluigi Chiassoni -- 9. Argument Structures in Legal Interpretation: Balancing and Thresholds; Michał Araszkiewicz -- 10. An Analysis of some Juristic Techniques for Handling Systematic Defects in the Law; Giovanni Battista Ratti -- 11. Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions; Eveline Feteris -- 12. Legal Argumentation and Theories of Adjudication in the U.S. Legal Tradition: Between Cass Sunstein's Minimalism, Richard Posner's Pragmatism and Ronald Dworkin's Advocacy of Integrity; Bernardo Goncalves Fernandes -- Index.
520 $a This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.
650 0 $a Forensic orations. $3 887875
650 0 $a Law $x Methodology. $3 587155
650 0 $a Semantics (Law) $3 587136
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 2 4 $a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. $3 1565627
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Law. $3 893937
700 1 $a Bustamante, Thomas. $3 2145661
700 1 $a Dahlman, Christian. $3 2145662
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
830 0 $a Law and philosophy library ; $v v.108. $3 2071925
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)