語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Interdisciplinary research and trans...
~
Gethmann, C.F.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims/ by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
其他作者:
Gethmann, C.F.
出版者:
Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
面頁冊數:
xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:
Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
Contained By:
Springer eBooks
標題:
Interdisciplinary research. -
電子資源:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
ISBN:
9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
[electronic resource] /by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.]. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xvi, 195 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Ethics of science and technology assessment,v.431860-4803 ;. - Ethics of science and technology assessment ;v.43..
Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
ISBN: 9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:
596732
Interdisciplinary research.
LC Class. No.: Q180.55.I48
Dewey Class. No.: 001.4
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
LDR
:02215nmm a2200325 a 4500
001
1993113
003
DE-He213
005
20150617143921.0
006
m d
007
cr nn 008maaau
008
151019s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020
$a
9783319114002 (electronic bk.)
020
$a
9783319113999 (paper)
024
7
$a
10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
$2
doi
035
$a
978-3-319-11400-2
040
$a
GP
$c
GP
041
0
$a
eng
050
4
$a
Q180.55.I48
072
7
$a
PDA
$2
bicssc
072
7
$a
SCI075000
$2
bisacsh
082
0 4
$a
001.4
$2
23
090
$a
Q180.55.I48
$b
I61 2015
245
0 0
$a
Interdisciplinary research and trans-disciplinary validity claims
$h
[electronic resource] /
$c
by C.F. Gethmann ... [et al.].
260
$a
Cham :
$b
Springer International Publishing :
$b
Imprint: Springer,
$c
2015.
300
$a
xvi, 195 p. :
$b
ill., digital ;
$c
24 cm.
490
1
$a
Ethics of science and technology assessment,
$x
1860-4803 ;
$v
v.43
505
0
$a
Introduction -- Science in Society -- Knowing and Acting -- Trans-disciplinary Deliberation -- Conclusions/Recommandations.
520
$a
Interdisciplinarity has seemingly become a paradigm for modern and meaningful research. Clearly, the interdisciplinary modus of deliberation enables to unfold relevant but quite different disciplinary perspectives to the reflection of broader scientific questions or societal problems. However, whether the comprehensive results of interdisciplinary reflection prove to be valid or to be acceptable in trans-disciplinary terms depends upon certain preconditions, which have to be fulfilled for securing scientific quality and social trust in advisory contexts. The present book is written by experts and practitioners of interdisciplinary research and policy advice. It analyses topical and methodological approaches towards interdisciplinarity, starting with the current role of scientific research in society. The volume continues with contributions to the issues of knowledge and acting and to trans-disciplinary deliberation. The final conclusions address the scientific system as substantial actor itself as well as the relevant research and education politics.
650
0
$a
Interdisciplinary research.
$3
596732
650
1 4
$a
Philosophy.
$3
516511
650
2 4
$a
Philosophy of Science.
$3
894954
650
2 4
$a
R & D/Technology Policy.
$3
895529
650
2 4
$a
Knowledge - Discourse.
$3
2068364
700
1
$a
Gethmann, C.F.
$3
2131120
710
2
$a
SpringerLink (Online service)
$3
836513
773
0
$t
Springer eBooks
830
0
$a
Ethics of science and technology assessment ;
$v
v.43.
$3
2131121
856
4 0
$u
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11400-2
950
$a
Engineering (Springer-11647)
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9265821
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB Q180.55.I48
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入