東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The development of green building pe...

Yoo, Young Jun.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The development of green building performance assessment tool (gbpat).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The development of green building performance assessment tool (gbpat)./
作者:	Yoo, Young Jun.
面頁冊數:	300 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-05B(E).
標題:	Environmental Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3609740
ISBN:	9781303688881

The development of green building performance assessment tool (gbpat).
Yoo, Young Jun.

The development of green building performance assessment tool (gbpat). - 300 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2014.

This dissertation consists of two studies: (1) establishment of an evaluation tool framework to determine the proper investment to make the building LEED-certified with the consideration of the initial investment cost using the statistical analyses of integrated Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) and (2) development of a Green Building Performance Assessment Tool (GBPAT). The first research effort demonstrated that the initial incremental investment was not closely related with the earned points on Energy & Atmosphere (EA) and Water Efficiency (WE) credits but was clearly related with energy-related points. The Cost Effectiveness Index (CEI) proposed in this study was found to represent the net savings of the life cycle costs and cost effectiveness for a green building better than LEED. LCA and LCCA methods would be adopted for GBPAT to address these issues. GBPAT would provide the information that helps all participants, such as building owners, building managers, building occupants, and society who are involved and impacted by building performance. They have their own demands on the information of building performance, such as affordable financial investment, expected financial benefits, lower environmental impacts, and better indoor environment. Users should be able to make a strategic decision to evaluate various alternative designs or retrofitting schemes for sustainable building. Moreover, applying social costs to total LCC of green building would lead to a reduction in environmental burden to society and significantly improve indoor environmental quality affecting the health of occupants since users are able to recognize that these social costs may impact the entire building LCC.

ISBN: 9781303688881Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669635
Environmental Studies.

The development of green building performance assessment tool (gbpat).
LDR:02640nam a2200289 4500 001 1968912
005 20141231071635.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303688881
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3609740
035 $a AAI3609740
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yoo, Young Jun. $3 2106143
245 1 4 $a The development of green building performance assessment tool (gbpat).
300 $a 300 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: JAE K. PARK.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2014.
520 $a This dissertation consists of two studies: (1) establishment of an evaluation tool framework to determine the proper investment to make the building LEED-certified with the consideration of the initial investment cost using the statistical analyses of integrated Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) and (2) development of a Green Building Performance Assessment Tool (GBPAT). The first research effort demonstrated that the initial incremental investment was not closely related with the earned points on Energy & Atmosphere (EA) and Water Efficiency (WE) credits but was clearly related with energy-related points. The Cost Effectiveness Index (CEI) proposed in this study was found to represent the net savings of the life cycle costs and cost effectiveness for a green building better than LEED. LCA and LCCA methods would be adopted for GBPAT to address these issues. GBPAT would provide the information that helps all participants, such as building owners, building managers, building occupants, and society who are involved and impacted by building performance. They have their own demands on the information of building performance, such as affordable financial investment, expected financial benefits, lower environmental impacts, and better indoor environment. Users should be able to make a strategic decision to evaluate various alternative designs or retrofitting schemes for sustainable building. Moreover, applying social costs to total LCC of green building would lead to a reduction in environmental burden to society and significantly improve indoor environmental quality affecting the health of occupants since users are able to recognize that these social costs may impact the entire building LCC.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Environmental Studies. $3 1669635
650 4 $a Engineering, Civil. $3 783781
650 4 $a Engineering, Architectural. $3 1671790
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0543
690 $a 0462
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Environment & Resources. $3 2106144
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-05B(E).
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3609740