東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Government, chaebol and labour: Disc...

Graham-Barter, Erinn Edith.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Government, chaebol and labour: Discontent in South Korea.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Government, chaebol and labour: Discontent in South Korea./
作者:	Graham-Barter, Erinn Edith.
面頁冊數:	158 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 8140.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International42-03.
標題:	Political Science, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ83582
ISBN:	9780612835825

Government, chaebol and labour: Discontent in South Korea.
Graham-Barter, Erinn Edith.

Government, chaebol and labour: Discontent in South Korea. - 158 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 8140.

Thesis (M.A.)--Dalhousie University (Canada), 2003.

The oft spoken of 'Asian Miracle,' of which South Korea is an example, is the actualization of the developmental model that saw rapid growth of the Korean state. Mainstream theories cite the close relationship between government and chaebol as the factor that drove development. Often left out of the equation is labour, when in fact Korea's development and close relations between government and business came at the expense of labour. Industrial relations until 1987 were a non-issue as the government and chaebol worked together to repress labour. However, since democratization in 1987, industrial relations have exploded onto the scene in, marked with bouts of extreme confrontation and violence, but little cooperation. The power structure in Korean politics and economics has expanded since the time of development, to now include labour, resulting in the powerful triad of government, chaebol and labour. Relations among members of the triad are tense and for the most part uncooperative as their relationships are tainted with a history of mistrust, corruption, collusion and repression. How these groups relate to each other is affected by cultural factors that inform Korean interaction, such as Confucianism, colonialism and war experience. In more recent history, relations among the triad have been further complicated with the political and economic repercussions of democratization, liberalization and economic crisis. The consequence of a history with developmentalism, combined with Korean cultural factors and topped off with recent major political and economic changes is extremely precarious labour relations that threaten political and economic instability. The members of the triad have, thus far, not been able to find a way to establish cooperative industrial relations, and given the outstanding issues that exist between the members as well as new points of contention on the horizon, industrial relations in Korea are likely to get worsen before getting better.

ISBN: 9780612835825Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017391
Political Science, General.

Government, chaebol and labour: Discontent in South Korea.
LDR:02830nam a2200277 4500 001 1968614
005 20141210112727.5
008 150210s2003 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780612835825
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAIMQ83582
035 $a AAIMQ83582
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Graham-Barter, Erinn Edith. $3 2105793
245 1 0 $a Government, chaebol and labour: Discontent in South Korea.
300 $a 158 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-03, page: 8140.
500 $a Adviser: Marc Lanteigne.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Dalhousie University (Canada), 2003.
520 $a The oft spoken of 'Asian Miracle,' of which South Korea is an example, is the actualization of the developmental model that saw rapid growth of the Korean state. Mainstream theories cite the close relationship between government and chaebol as the factor that drove development. Often left out of the equation is labour, when in fact Korea's development and close relations between government and business came at the expense of labour. Industrial relations until 1987 were a non-issue as the government and chaebol worked together to repress labour. However, since democratization in 1987, industrial relations have exploded onto the scene in, marked with bouts of extreme confrontation and violence, but little cooperation. The power structure in Korean politics and economics has expanded since the time of development, to now include labour, resulting in the powerful triad of government, chaebol and labour. Relations among members of the triad are tense and for the most part uncooperative as their relationships are tainted with a history of mistrust, corruption, collusion and repression. How these groups relate to each other is affected by cultural factors that inform Korean interaction, such as Confucianism, colonialism and war experience. In more recent history, relations among the triad have been further complicated with the political and economic repercussions of democratization, liberalization and economic crisis. The consequence of a history with developmentalism, combined with Korean cultural factors and topped off with recent major political and economic changes is extremely precarious labour relations that threaten political and economic instability. The members of the triad have, thus far, not been able to find a way to establish cooperative industrial relations, and given the outstanding issues that exist between the members as well as new points of contention on the horizon, industrial relations in Korea are likely to get worsen before getting better.
590 $a School code: 0328.
650 4 $a Political Science, General. $3 1017391
650 4 $a Sociology, Industrial and Labor Relations. $3 1017858
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a Dalhousie University (Canada). $3 1017625
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 42-03.
790 $a 0328
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2003
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=MQ83582