東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Coping with death: Does religious co...

Despain, Laran H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Coping with death: Does religious coping contribute to outcomes when general coping is considered?

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Coping with death: Does religious coping contribute to outcomes when general coping is considered?/
作者:	Despain, Laran H.
面頁冊數:	111 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-09B(E).
標題:	Psychology, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3561952
ISBN:	9781303093647

Coping with death: Does religious coping contribute to outcomes when general coping is considered?
Despain, Laran H.

Coping with death: Does religious coping contribute to outcomes when general coping is considered? - 111 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Wyoming, 2013.

Previous researchers have not demonstrated incremental validity of using scales of religious coping over standard measures of coping. Using a sample of bereaved adults, I tested the incremental validity of the RCOPE (Pargament, Koenig, & Perez, 2000) compared to the COPE (Carver, Scheir, & Weintraub, 1989), a coping scale that is not specific to religious coping but does include items about religious coping. Dependent variables were symptoms of major depression as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996), grief-specific distress as measured by the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG; Prigerson et al., 1995), and well-being as measured by the Scales of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff, 1989). To test for incremental validity, I controlled for religiousness in regression models then added the COPE followed by the RCOPE. A large degree of collinearity forced me to exclude a small number of COPE subscales and nearly every RCOPE subscale to obtain models that were not explaining all variance in outcome variables (over fitting the data). The models that included RCOPE subscales typically explained relatively little additional variance in the outcomes compared to models with the religiosity and COPE subscales alone. Therefore, the added benefits of the RCOPE do not warrant the burden of administering the full scale and generally contribute little to the understanding of likely outcomes of grief.

ISBN: 9781303093647Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018034
Psychology, General.

Coping with death: Does religious coping contribute to outcomes when general coping is considered?
LDR:02364nam a2200289 4500 001 1968434
005 20141210112829.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303093647
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3561952
035 $a AAI3561952
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Despain, Laran H. $3 2105594
245 1 0 $a Coping with death: Does religious coping contribute to outcomes when general coping is considered?
300 $a 111 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-09(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Walter D. Scott.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Wyoming, 2013.
520 $a Previous researchers have not demonstrated incremental validity of using scales of religious coping over standard measures of coping. Using a sample of bereaved adults, I tested the incremental validity of the RCOPE (Pargament, Koenig, & Perez, 2000) compared to the COPE (Carver, Scheir, & Weintraub, 1989), a coping scale that is not specific to religious coping but does include items about religious coping. Dependent variables were symptoms of major depression as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996), grief-specific distress as measured by the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG; Prigerson et al., 1995), and well-being as measured by the Scales of Psychological Well-Being (Ryff, 1989). To test for incremental validity, I controlled for religiousness in regression models then added the COPE followed by the RCOPE. A large degree of collinearity forced me to exclude a small number of COPE subscales and nearly every RCOPE subscale to obtain models that were not explaining all variance in outcome variables (over fitting the data). The models that included RCOPE subscales typically explained relatively little additional variance in the outcomes compared to models with the religiosity and COPE subscales alone. Therefore, the added benefits of the RCOPE do not warrant the burden of administering the full scale and generally contribute little to the understanding of likely outcomes of grief.
590 $a School code: 0264.
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Counseling. $3 1669154
650 4 $a Religion, General. $3 1017453
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0318
710 2 $a University of Wyoming. $b Psychology. $3 2102139
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-09B(E).
790 $a 0264
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3561952