東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Acting wide awake: Attention and the...

Davis, Jacob H.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Acting wide awake: Attention and the ethics of emotion.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Acting wide awake: Attention and the ethics of emotion./
作者:	Davis, Jacob H.
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-06A(E).
標題:	Ethics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3612319
ISBN:	9781303738593

Acting wide awake: Attention and the ethics of emotion.
Davis, Jacob H.

Acting wide awake: Attention and the ethics of emotion. - 165 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2014.

In cases where two human cultures disagree over fundamental ethical values, metaethical questions about what could make one or the other position correct arise with great force. Philosophers committed to naturalistically plausible accounts of ethics have offered little hope of adjudicating such conflicts, leading some to embrace moral relativism. In my dissertation, I develop an empirically grounded response to moral relativism by turning away from debates over which action types are right and wrong and focusing instead on shared features of human emotional motivation. On my account, being motivated by ill-will is ethically bad (if it is), just because human beings who are fully and accurately aware of how unpleasant it is to be motivated in this way will agree that we ought not to act out of ill-will. Conversely, good-will is ethically good (if it is) just because we ourselves would judge it to be so, if we were fully and accurately aware of how much more ease is present in being motivated in this way. More generally, by appealing to ethical judgments that all members of our human moral community would make if they were alert and unbiased, we can make sense of the idea that individuals and groups sometimes get the normative truth wrong, and that we sometimes get it right. In this way, the experiential ease and unease that is characteristic of various emotional motivations in virtue of our shared human neurobiology can ground a circumscribed set of universal claims about which motivations we ought to act out of, while leaving many other aspects of how we ought to live open to cultural determination.

ISBN: 9781303738593Subjects--Topical Terms:

517264
Ethics.

Acting wide awake: Attention and the ethics of emotion.
LDR:02502nam a2200289 4500 001 1968324
005 20141203120941.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303738593
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3612319
035 $a AAI3612319
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Davis, Jacob H. $3 2105471
245 1 0 $a Acting wide awake: Attention and the ethics of emotion.
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jesse J. Prinz.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2014.
520 $a In cases where two human cultures disagree over fundamental ethical values, metaethical questions about what could make one or the other position correct arise with great force. Philosophers committed to naturalistically plausible accounts of ethics have offered little hope of adjudicating such conflicts, leading some to embrace moral relativism. In my dissertation, I develop an empirically grounded response to moral relativism by turning away from debates over which action types are right and wrong and focusing instead on shared features of human emotional motivation. On my account, being motivated by ill-will is ethically bad (if it is), just because human beings who are fully and accurately aware of how unpleasant it is to be motivated in this way will agree that we ought not to act out of ill-will. Conversely, good-will is ethically good (if it is) just because we ourselves would judge it to be so, if we were fully and accurately aware of how much more ease is present in being motivated in this way. More generally, by appealing to ethical judgments that all members of our human moral community would make if they were alert and unbiased, we can make sense of the idea that individuals and groups sometimes get the normative truth wrong, and that we sometimes get it right. In this way, the experiential ease and unease that is characteristic of various emotional motivations in virtue of our shared human neurobiology can ground a circumscribed set of universal claims about which motivations we ought to act out of, while leaving many other aspects of how we ought to live open to cultural determination.
590 $a School code: 0046.
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
650 4 $a Psychology, Behavioral. $3 1017677
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
690 $a 0394
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0396
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Philosophy. $3 1030648
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-06A(E).
790 $a 0046
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3612319