東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Building complexity, one stability a...

Mays, Chris.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Building complexity, one stability at a time: Rethinking stubbornness in public rhetorics and writing studies.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Building complexity, one stability at a time: Rethinking stubbornness in public rhetorics and writing studies./
作者:	Mays, Chris.
面頁冊數:	194 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-09A(E).
標題:	Language, Rhetoric and Composition. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3623439
ISBN:	9781303958700

Building complexity, one stability at a time: Rethinking stubbornness in public rhetorics and writing studies.
Mays, Chris.

Building complexity, one stability at a time: Rethinking stubbornness in public rhetorics and writing studies. - 194 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Illinois State University, 2014.

In deliberative argument, in political discourse, in teaching, and in casual conversation, as rhetors we often hope that our attempts at interaction will have some effect on the participants in these discursive environments. The phenomena of stubbornness, however, would seem to suggest that, despite our efforts, there are times when rhetoric just doesn't work. This dissertation complicates this premise, and in so doing complicates common understandings of both stubbornness and rhetorical effect. As I argue, rhetorical effects exist within a complex rhetoric system, within which they circulate and are interconnected with a diversity of other rhetorical and non-rhetorical elements. Using N. Katherine Hayles's concept of "making the cut," I argue that within such complex systems, stability and change are tangled up in an interdependent relationship; in short, in order for complexity to exist it must be constrained by contingent stabilities. These necessary stabilities mask the way that systems are always moving, and so we often do not see changes in the rhetoric systems we inhabit. In this sense, these changes are compensatory, and they work to maintain a stability that can manifest precisely as stubbornness. In delineating what I call a "rhetoric-systems" approach, this dissertation maps the stabilities and movements of several different rhetoric systems, and provides new insight into the complex and relational movement of rhetorical effect. Our use of this approach asks us to recognize the existence and value of certainty and stability, and then to pull back and recognize the existence of complexity and change. The approach integrates insights from systems theory (and so from the sciences) into existing rhetorical theory, and in so doing models an interdisciplinary approach to public rhetorics and writing studies that is firmly grounded in rhetorical theory.

ISBN: 9781303958700Subjects--Topical Terms:

1019205
Language, Rhetoric and Composition.

Building complexity, one stability at a time: Rethinking stubbornness in public rhetorics and writing studies.
LDR:02795nam a2200277 4500 001 1968050
005 20141121133106.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303958700
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3623439
035 $a AAI3623439
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mays, Chris. $3 2105164
245 1 0 $a Building complexity, one stability at a time: Rethinking stubbornness in public rhetorics and writing studies.
300 $a 194 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Julie Jung.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Illinois State University, 2014.
520 $a In deliberative argument, in political discourse, in teaching, and in casual conversation, as rhetors we often hope that our attempts at interaction will have some effect on the participants in these discursive environments. The phenomena of stubbornness, however, would seem to suggest that, despite our efforts, there are times when rhetoric just doesn't work. This dissertation complicates this premise, and in so doing complicates common understandings of both stubbornness and rhetorical effect. As I argue, rhetorical effects exist within a complex rhetoric system, within which they circulate and are interconnected with a diversity of other rhetorical and non-rhetorical elements. Using N. Katherine Hayles's concept of "making the cut," I argue that within such complex systems, stability and change are tangled up in an interdependent relationship; in short, in order for complexity to exist it must be constrained by contingent stabilities. These necessary stabilities mask the way that systems are always moving, and so we often do not see changes in the rhetoric systems we inhabit. In this sense, these changes are compensatory, and they work to maintain a stability that can manifest precisely as stubbornness. In delineating what I call a "rhetoric-systems" approach, this dissertation maps the stabilities and movements of several different rhetoric systems, and provides new insight into the complex and relational movement of rhetorical effect. Our use of this approach asks us to recognize the existence and value of certainty and stability, and then to pull back and recognize the existence of complexity and change. The approach integrates insights from systems theory (and so from the sciences) into existing rhetorical theory, and in so doing models an interdisciplinary approach to public rhetorics and writing studies that is firmly grounded in rhetorical theory.
590 $a School code: 0092.
650 4 $a Language, Rhetoric and Composition. $3 1019205
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0393
710 2 $a Illinois State University. $b Department of English. $3 2105165
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-09A(E).
790 $a 0092
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3623439