東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A history of antiquities ownership i...

Daniels, Brian Isaac.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A history of antiquities ownership in the United States, 1870--1934.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A history of antiquities ownership in the United States, 1870--1934./
作者:	Daniels, Brian Isaac.
面頁冊數:	303 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-02A(E).
標題:	Cultural Resources Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3542794
ISBN:	9781267712646

A history of antiquities ownership in the United States, 1870--1934.
Daniels, Brian Isaac.

A history of antiquities ownership in the United States, 1870--1934. - 303 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2012.

This dissertation investigates the relationship between antiquities and property rights during the "golden age" of American museum collecting in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While contemporary arguments over cultural property receive a great deal of attention from academics and the general public, few analyses have looked to how competing theories of ownership have historically structured access to archaeological remains and determined licit and illicit actions when appropriating ancient art and antiquities. In exploring how property debates became a regular feature of museum acquisition and archaeological practice, this study looks to the manifold ways that discourses about antiquities evolved into specific cultural policies, how these policies were themselves contested, and what their impact has been upon public institutions and the professionalization of American archaeology. It considers four specific legal regimes governing the ownership of antiquities: U.S. tariff laws that assessed a duty on imported private property; the Antiquities Act of 1906, which established federal ownership over undiscovered antiquities on public domain lands; state laws and local activism concerning Native American artifacts; and trust property overseen by the Office of Indian Affairs. Archaeological remains were subject to varied and frequently conflicting claims in each of these different domains. At the same time, these concerns about ownership extended beyond the possession of artifacts to questions about the pedagogical value and need for collecting archaeological material; the nexus between the public good and scientific prerogatives; and the role of the federal government in maintaining a policy favorable to collecting by cultural institutions at the turn of the twentieth century.

ISBN: 9781267712646Subjects--Topical Terms:

1672692
Cultural Resources Management.

A history of antiquities ownership in the United States, 1870--1934.
LDR:02751nam a2200301 4500 001 1967995
005 20141121133056.5
008 150210s2012 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781267712646
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3542794
035 $a AAI3542794
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Daniels, Brian Isaac. $3 2105093
245 1 2 $a A history of antiquities ownership in the United States, 1870--1934.
300 $a 303 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Richard M. Leventhal; Kathy Peiss.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2012.
520 $a This dissertation investigates the relationship between antiquities and property rights during the "golden age" of American museum collecting in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. While contemporary arguments over cultural property receive a great deal of attention from academics and the general public, few analyses have looked to how competing theories of ownership have historically structured access to archaeological remains and determined licit and illicit actions when appropriating ancient art and antiquities. In exploring how property debates became a regular feature of museum acquisition and archaeological practice, this study looks to the manifold ways that discourses about antiquities evolved into specific cultural policies, how these policies were themselves contested, and what their impact has been upon public institutions and the professionalization of American archaeology. It considers four specific legal regimes governing the ownership of antiquities: U.S. tariff laws that assessed a duty on imported private property; the Antiquities Act of 1906, which established federal ownership over undiscovered antiquities on public domain lands; state laws and local activism concerning Native American artifacts; and trust property overseen by the Office of Indian Affairs. Archaeological remains were subject to varied and frequently conflicting claims in each of these different domains. At the same time, these concerns about ownership extended beyond the possession of artifacts to questions about the pedagogical value and need for collecting archaeological material; the nexus between the public good and scientific prerogatives; and the role of the federal government in maintaining a policy favorable to collecting by cultural institutions at the turn of the twentieth century.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Cultural Resources Management. $3 1672692
650 4 $a History, United States. $3 1017393
650 4 $a History of Science. $3 896972
650 4 $a Museology. $3 1018504
690 $a 0436
690 $a 0337
690 $a 0585
690 $a 0730
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Anthropology. $3 2092535
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-02A(E).
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2012
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3542794