東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Collaborative Stimulation in Team De...

Sauder, Jonathan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Collaborative Stimulation in Team Design Thinking.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Collaborative Stimulation in Team Design Thinking./
作者:	Sauder, Jonathan.
面頁冊數:	137 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-05B(E).
標題:	Engineering, Mechanical. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3609998
ISBN:	9781303694844

Collaborative Stimulation in Team Design Thinking.
Sauder, Jonathan.

Collaborative Stimulation in Team Design Thinking. - 137 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2013.

In both design education and industry it is often assumed that collaboration encourages creativity, although research in brainstorming has shown that this is not always the case. There is an opportunity to develop more effective collaborative methods, based on research. This work lays the groundwork for new methods, by extending creative cognition to group creativity by proposing an interactive cognition approach. Specifically, designers' interactions, through questions and shared design entities, stimulate creativity relevant thought processes. Various types of collaborative stimulation are identified, namely, prompting, seeding, correcting, and clarifying. An experiment using collaborative retrospective protocol analysis was developed to determine if the hypothesized types of collaborative stimulation exist and how influential each type was by exploring stimulation patterns. Patterns were found between collaborative stimulation and thought processes, novelty of ideas, and analogies. Specifically, prompting had a strong relationship with memory retrieval, seeding and correcting had strong relationships with transformation, and clarifying had moderate to strong relationships with memory retrieval, association, and transformation. Also, seeding and correcting were found to create the most novel ideas. Additional patterns were found between the past creative experience of individuals and stimulation frequency, and designers were found to be stimulated more often in collaborative than individual settings. The implications of these patterns for developing new methods to promote group creativity are discussed.

ISBN: 9781303694844Subjects--Topical Terms:

783786
Engineering, Mechanical.

Collaborative Stimulation in Team Design Thinking.
LDR:02523nam a2200301 4500 001 1967774
005 20141124124236.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303694844
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3609998
035 $a AAI3609998
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sauder, Jonathan. $3 2104848
245 1 0 $a Collaborative Stimulation in Team Design Thinking.
300 $a 137 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Yan Jin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Southern California, 2013.
520 $a In both design education and industry it is often assumed that collaboration encourages creativity, although research in brainstorming has shown that this is not always the case. There is an opportunity to develop more effective collaborative methods, based on research. This work lays the groundwork for new methods, by extending creative cognition to group creativity by proposing an interactive cognition approach. Specifically, designers' interactions, through questions and shared design entities, stimulate creativity relevant thought processes. Various types of collaborative stimulation are identified, namely, prompting, seeding, correcting, and clarifying. An experiment using collaborative retrospective protocol analysis was developed to determine if the hypothesized types of collaborative stimulation exist and how influential each type was by exploring stimulation patterns. Patterns were found between collaborative stimulation and thought processes, novelty of ideas, and analogies. Specifically, prompting had a strong relationship with memory retrieval, seeding and correcting had strong relationships with transformation, and clarifying had moderate to strong relationships with memory retrieval, association, and transformation. Also, seeding and correcting were found to create the most novel ideas. Additional patterns were found between the past creative experience of individuals and stimulation frequency, and designers were found to be stimulated more often in collaborative than individual settings. The implications of these patterns for developing new methods to promote group creativity are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0208.
650 4 $a Engineering, Mechanical. $3 783786
650 4 $a Psychology, Industrial. $3 520063
650 4 $a Design and Decorative Arts. $3 1024640
650 4 $a Psychology, Cognitive. $3 1017810
690 $a 0548
690 $a 0624
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a University of Southern California. $b Mechanical Engineering. $3 1669217
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-05B(E).
790 $a 0208
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3609998