東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Public Health Implications of Arseni...

Johnston, Adam.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Public Health Implications of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils: A Legacy of Historical Pesticide Application Practices.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Public Health Implications of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils: A Legacy of Historical Pesticide Application Practices./
作者:	Johnston, Adam.
面頁冊數:	196 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-02B(E).
標題:	Environmental Sciences. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600185
ISBN:	9781303502392

Public Health Implications of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils: A Legacy of Historical Pesticide Application Practices.
Johnston, Adam.

Public Health Implications of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils: A Legacy of Historical Pesticide Application Practices. - 196 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Dr.P.H.)--The George Washington University, 2013.

Arsenic-based pesticides were used extensively, starting in the late-1800s and continuing into the mid-20th century. Although arsenical pesticides were used primarily on apple and other tree fruit crops, these pesticides were also used on a wide variety of row crops. This research looked at the presence of arsenic in soil on properties used during the first half of the 20th century for (non-orchard) farming. The research relied on existing arsenic surface soil sampling data collected by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) as part of the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes Project. The current and historical land use at each of 180 USGS sampling location in the northeastern U.S. were determined based on historical aerial photographs, to classify each location as historically agricultural or non-agricultural. A higher average surface soil arsenic concentration was observed in the historical agricultural land use group compared to the non-agricultural land use (8.28 mg/kg vs. 6.06 mg/kg). A non-parametric statistical comparison indicated a significant difference (Z=3.34, p=0.0008) between the two data sets. Graphical representations of the data indicated apparent differences between the agricultural and non-agricultural data sets. Thus, the historical application of arsenical pesticides to crops appears to have resulted in a slight upward shift in the natural distribution of arsenic soil concentrations across the group of former agricultural properties. Moreover, typical pesticide application methods for row crops and subsequent tilling reduce the likelihood of localized hot spots as observed in historical orchard properties. This conceptual model makes it difficult to distinguish between naturally occurring arsenic and any contribution from past agricultural use of arsenical pesticides. A review of current public health policies relating to arsenic in soil from historical pesticide application for several New England states is provided and a decision analytic framework for evaluating potentially affected properties, as well as possible applications of the framework, are proposed.

ISBN: 9781303502392Subjects--Topical Terms:

676987
Environmental Sciences.

Public Health Implications of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils: A Legacy of Historical Pesticide Application Practices.
LDR:03073nam a2200289 4500 001 1967646
005 20141124080608.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303502392
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3600185
035 $a AAI3600185
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnston, Adam. $3 2104698
245 1 0 $a Public Health Implications of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils: A Legacy of Historical Pesticide Application Practices.
300 $a 196 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-02(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: George Gray.
502 $a Thesis (Dr.P.H.)--The George Washington University, 2013.
520 $a Arsenic-based pesticides were used extensively, starting in the late-1800s and continuing into the mid-20th century. Although arsenical pesticides were used primarily on apple and other tree fruit crops, these pesticides were also used on a wide variety of row crops. This research looked at the presence of arsenic in soil on properties used during the first half of the 20th century for (non-orchard) farming. The research relied on existing arsenic surface soil sampling data collected by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) as part of the North American Soil Geochemical Landscapes Project. The current and historical land use at each of 180 USGS sampling location in the northeastern U.S. were determined based on historical aerial photographs, to classify each location as historically agricultural or non-agricultural. A higher average surface soil arsenic concentration was observed in the historical agricultural land use group compared to the non-agricultural land use (8.28 mg/kg vs. 6.06 mg/kg). A non-parametric statistical comparison indicated a significant difference (Z=3.34, p=0.0008) between the two data sets. Graphical representations of the data indicated apparent differences between the agricultural and non-agricultural data sets. Thus, the historical application of arsenical pesticides to crops appears to have resulted in a slight upward shift in the natural distribution of arsenic soil concentrations across the group of former agricultural properties. Moreover, typical pesticide application methods for row crops and subsequent tilling reduce the likelihood of localized hot spots as observed in historical orchard properties. This conceptual model makes it difficult to distinguish between naturally occurring arsenic and any contribution from past agricultural use of arsenical pesticides. A review of current public health policies relating to arsenic in soil from historical pesticide application for several New England states is provided and a decision analytic framework for evaluating potentially affected properties, as well as possible applications of the framework, are proposed.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Environmental Sciences. $3 676987
650 4 $a Environmental Health. $3 578282
650 4 $a Health Sciences, Public Health. $3 1017659
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0470
690 $a 0573
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Public Health and Health Services. $3 1684902
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-02B(E).
790 $a 0075
791 $a Dr.P.H.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3600185