東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Relationship Between Catastrophi...

Kronfli, Tarek R.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia on Experimental Pain.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia on Experimental Pain./
作者:	Kronfli, Tarek R.
面頁冊數:	68 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International74-12B(E).
標題:	Psychology, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3589766
ISBN:	9781303288357

The Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia on Experimental Pain.
Kronfli, Tarek R.

The Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia on Experimental Pain. - 68 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Alliant International University, 2014.

The efficacy of hypnotic analgesia has been demonstrated in previous controlled trials involving clinical pain problems and induced pain in laboratory settings. Individuals who screen high for hypnotizability often report marked reductions in pain ratings, particularly the affective dimension, following administration of hypnotic suggestions. However, the role of hypnotic analgesia in influencing catastrophic thinking in response to painful stimulation has, to date, received no empirical attention. This study sought to compare differences in pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and pain catastrophizing responses to cold pressor induced pain in individuals receiving either hypnotic suggestion (intervention) or no intervention (control). A total of 24 healthy and highly hypnotizable individuals completed the study (12 intervention, 12 no intervention). Study participants each completed two pain induction sessions and provided pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and pain catastrophizing ratings across each session. Approximately two weeks separated testing sessions; during this time the intervention group participated in therapist- and self-facilitated hypnosis while the no intervention group was not offered or instructed to do anything. Results revealed significant group effects for pain intensity (F(1, 22) = 12.364, p = 0.002) and pain unpleasantness (F(1, 22) = 11.725, p = 0.002) ratings, such that participants in the intervention group reported significantly lower ratings compared to those in the no intervention group. Similarly, results were found for pain catastrophizing (F (1, 22) = 9.485, p = 0.005), such that participants in the intervention group reported significantly lower catastrophizing compared to those in the no intervention group. Zero-order relationships for the entire sample revealed that decreasing pain catastrophizing scores were significantly associated with decreasing pain intensity (r = 0.537, p = 0.007) and unpleasantness (r = 0.564, p = 0.004) ratings, but statistically nonsignificant when examined for each group separately. This study provides further evidence supporting hypnotic analgesia, and is seemingly the first to provide limited support for a relation between hypnosis and less pain catastrophizing. The ability of hypnosis to affect catastrophic thinking during acute noxious stimulation is encouraging as hypnosis may alter cognitive processing thereby minimizing catastrophic thinking. Further investigation regarding the ability of hypnosis to reduce catastrophic thinking appears warranted.

ISBN: 9781303288357Subjects--Topical Terms:

1018034
Psychology, General.

The Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia on Experimental Pain.
LDR:03504nam a2200289 4500 001 1967305
005 20141112080253.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303288357
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3589766
035 $a AAI3589766
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kronfli, Tarek R. $3 2104272
245 1 4 $a The Relationship Between Catastrophizing and the Effects of Hypnotic Analgesia on Experimental Pain.
300 $a 68 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 74-12(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Alan Swope.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Alliant International University, 2014.
520 $a The efficacy of hypnotic analgesia has been demonstrated in previous controlled trials involving clinical pain problems and induced pain in laboratory settings. Individuals who screen high for hypnotizability often report marked reductions in pain ratings, particularly the affective dimension, following administration of hypnotic suggestions. However, the role of hypnotic analgesia in influencing catastrophic thinking in response to painful stimulation has, to date, received no empirical attention. This study sought to compare differences in pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and pain catastrophizing responses to cold pressor induced pain in individuals receiving either hypnotic suggestion (intervention) or no intervention (control). A total of 24 healthy and highly hypnotizable individuals completed the study (12 intervention, 12 no intervention). Study participants each completed two pain induction sessions and provided pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and pain catastrophizing ratings across each session. Approximately two weeks separated testing sessions; during this time the intervention group participated in therapist- and self-facilitated hypnosis while the no intervention group was not offered or instructed to do anything. Results revealed significant group effects for pain intensity (F(1, 22) = 12.364, p = 0.002) and pain unpleasantness (F(1, 22) = 11.725, p = 0.002) ratings, such that participants in the intervention group reported significantly lower ratings compared to those in the no intervention group. Similarly, results were found for pain catastrophizing (F (1, 22) = 9.485, p = 0.005), such that participants in the intervention group reported significantly lower catastrophizing compared to those in the no intervention group. Zero-order relationships for the entire sample revealed that decreasing pain catastrophizing scores were significantly associated with decreasing pain intensity (r = 0.537, p = 0.007) and unpleasantness (r = 0.564, p = 0.004) ratings, but statistically nonsignificant when examined for each group separately. This study provides further evidence supporting hypnotic analgesia, and is seemingly the first to provide limited support for a relation between hypnosis and less pain catastrophizing. The ability of hypnosis to affect catastrophic thinking during acute noxious stimulation is encouraging as hypnosis may alter cognitive processing thereby minimizing catastrophic thinking. Further investigation regarding the ability of hypnosis to reduce catastrophic thinking appears warranted.
590 $a School code: 1634.
650 4 $a Psychology, General. $3 1018034
650 4 $a Psychology, Clinical. $3 524864
650 4 $a Psychology, Experimental. $3 517106
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Alliant International University. $b Psychology. $3 2104273
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 74-12B(E).
790 $a 1634
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3589766