東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Factor analysis of disruptive techno...

Warner, Eugene E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Factor analysis of disruptive technology approaches and company demographics in defense SBIR Phase 1 competition.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Factor analysis of disruptive technology approaches and company demographics in defense SBIR Phase 1 competition./
作者:	Warner, Eugene E.
面頁冊數:	127 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-06A(E).
標題:	Business Administration, General. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3612247
ISBN:	9781303736032

Factor analysis of disruptive technology approaches and company demographics in defense SBIR Phase 1 competition.
Warner, Eugene E.

Factor analysis of disruptive technology approaches and company demographics in defense SBIR Phase 1 competition. - 127 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2014.

The U.S. national defense establishment invests approximately $70 billion dollars annually for weapon system research and development. Most of this investment is to advance technology along predictable trajectories; however, the advantage realized comes at increasing cost. Disruptive innovation theory indicates that focusing on the architecture of technology solutions can open development pathways that offer significant military advantage. This study explores the relationship between an organization's technology development approach (TDA) and its success in winning SBIR Phase 1 competitions. The research posits a difference in SBIR Phase 1 success between companies using sustaining and disruptive TDA. Companies responding to DARPA SBIR Phase 1 solicitations are surveyed to determine their approach to developing technology solutions. A newly developed instrument is used to identify disruptive and sustaining TDA. Demographic data, SBIR success, and data on TDA are collected. Principal axis factoring was used to identify four orthogonal factors related to TDA. The factors were interpreted and a new objective scale was developed to measure sustaining TDA. Correlation and regression analyses indicated TDA is a contributing factor in SBIR Phase 1 success. Focus on the defense market and company inventiveness as measured by patent activity are also predictors. The findings indicate TDA mediates a company's focus and success at winning SBIR Phase 1 contracts. Implications for defense acquisition and disruptive innovation are discussed. A new conceptual framework linking focus, capability, inventiveness, and TDA with SBIR Phase 1 success is proposed for further research.

ISBN: 9781303736032Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017457
Business Administration, General.

Factor analysis of disruptive technology approaches and company demographics in defense SBIR Phase 1 competition.
LDR:02635nam a2200301 4500 001 1966973
005 20141112075558.5
008 150210s2014 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303736032
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3612247
035 $a AAI3612247
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Warner, Eugene E. $3 2103879
245 1 0 $a Factor analysis of disruptive technology approaches and company demographics in defense SBIR Phase 1 competition.
300 $a 127 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-06(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Marc Muchnick.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2014.
520 $a The U.S. national defense establishment invests approximately $70 billion dollars annually for weapon system research and development. Most of this investment is to advance technology along predictable trajectories; however, the advantage realized comes at increasing cost. Disruptive innovation theory indicates that focusing on the architecture of technology solutions can open development pathways that offer significant military advantage. This study explores the relationship between an organization's technology development approach (TDA) and its success in winning SBIR Phase 1 competitions. The research posits a difference in SBIR Phase 1 success between companies using sustaining and disruptive TDA. Companies responding to DARPA SBIR Phase 1 solicitations are surveyed to determine their approach to developing technology solutions. A newly developed instrument is used to identify disruptive and sustaining TDA. Demographic data, SBIR success, and data on TDA are collected. Principal axis factoring was used to identify four orthogonal factors related to TDA. The factors were interpreted and a new objective scale was developed to measure sustaining TDA. Correlation and regression analyses indicated TDA is a contributing factor in SBIR Phase 1 success. Focus on the defense market and company inventiveness as measured by patent activity are also predictors. The findings indicate TDA mediates a company's focus and success at winning SBIR Phase 1 contracts. Implications for defense acquisition and disruptive innovation are discussed. A new conceptual framework linking focus, capability, inventiveness, and TDA with SBIR Phase 1 success is proposed for further research.
590 $a School code: 1351.
650 4 $a Business Administration, General. $3 1017457
650 4 $a Business Administration, Management. $3 626628
650 4 $a Design and Decorative Arts. $3 1024640
650 4 $a Sociology, Demography. $3 1020257
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0938
710 2 $a Capella University. $b School of Business and Technology. $3 1673949
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-06A(E).
790 $a 1351
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2014
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3612247