東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Neural responses during trace condit...

Balderston, Nicholas L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Neural responses during trace conditioning with face and nonface stimuli recorded with magnetoencephalography.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Neural responses during trace conditioning with face and nonface stimuli recorded with magnetoencephalography./
作者:	Balderston, Nicholas L.
面頁冊數:	141 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International75-07B(E).
標題:	Psychology, Psychobiology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3615727
ISBN:	9781303818059

Neural responses during trace conditioning with face and nonface stimuli recorded with magnetoencephalography.
Balderston, Nicholas L.

Neural responses during trace conditioning with face and nonface stimuli recorded with magnetoencephalography. - 141 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2013.

During fear conditioning a subject is presented with an initially innocuous stimulus like an image (conditioned stimulus; CS) that predicts an aversive outcome like a mild electric shock (unconditioned stimulus; UCS). Subjects rapidly learn that the CS predicts the UCS, and show autonomic fear responses (CRs) during the presentation of the CS. When the CS and the UCS coterminate, as is the case for delay conditioning, individuals can acquire CRs even if they are unable to predict the occurrence of the UCS. However when there is a temporal gap between the CS and the UCS, CR expression is typically dependent upon explicit awareness of the CS-UCS pairing. Research with non-human animals suggests that both the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex are needed for trace but not delay fear conditioning, and that communication between these areas may help to maintain the CS during the trace interval. We tested this hypothesis by exposing subjects to differential delay and trace fear conditioning while we recorded their brain activity with magnetoencephalography. Faces and houses served as CSs and an aversive electrical stimulation served as the UCS. As predicted, subjects show evidence of conditioning on both implicit and explicit measures. In addition, there is a learning related increase in theta coherence between the left parahippocampal gyrus and several frontal and parietal cortical regions for trace but not delay conditioning. These results suggest that trace conditioning recruits a network of cortical regions, and that the activity of these regions is coordinated by the medial temporal lobe.

ISBN: 9781303818059Subjects--Topical Terms:

1017821
Psychology, Psychobiology.

Neural responses during trace conditioning with face and nonface stimuli recorded with magnetoencephalography.
LDR:02562nam a2200289 4500 001 1966677
005 20141112075042.5
008 150210s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303818059
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3615727
035 $a AAI3615727
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Balderston, Nicholas L. $3 2103529
245 1 0 $a Neural responses during trace conditioning with face and nonface stimuli recorded with magnetoencephalography.
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 75-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Fred Helmstetter.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2013.
520 $a During fear conditioning a subject is presented with an initially innocuous stimulus like an image (conditioned stimulus; CS) that predicts an aversive outcome like a mild electric shock (unconditioned stimulus; UCS). Subjects rapidly learn that the CS predicts the UCS, and show autonomic fear responses (CRs) during the presentation of the CS. When the CS and the UCS coterminate, as is the case for delay conditioning, individuals can acquire CRs even if they are unable to predict the occurrence of the UCS. However when there is a temporal gap between the CS and the UCS, CR expression is typically dependent upon explicit awareness of the CS-UCS pairing. Research with non-human animals suggests that both the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex are needed for trace but not delay fear conditioning, and that communication between these areas may help to maintain the CS during the trace interval. We tested this hypothesis by exposing subjects to differential delay and trace fear conditioning while we recorded their brain activity with magnetoencephalography. Faces and houses served as CSs and an aversive electrical stimulation served as the UCS. As predicted, subjects show evidence of conditioning on both implicit and explicit measures. In addition, there is a learning related increase in theta coherence between the left parahippocampal gyrus and several frontal and parietal cortical regions for trace but not delay conditioning. These results suggest that trace conditioning recruits a network of cortical regions, and that the activity of these regions is coordinated by the medial temporal lobe.
590 $a School code: 0263.
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychobiology. $3 1017821
650 4 $a Biology, Neuroscience. $3 1017680
650 4 $a Psychology, Psychometrics. $3 1017742
690 $a 0349
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0632
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. $b Psychology. $3 2102598
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 75-07B(E).
790 $a 0263
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3615727